G Poludniowski et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 6931 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/22/012
G Poludniowski, P M Evans and S Webb
Show affiliationsMonte Carlo simulation is the gold standard method for modelling scattering processes in medical x-ray imaging. General-purpose Monte Carlo codes, however, typically use the independent atom approximation (IAA). This is known to be inaccurate for Rayleigh scattering, for many materials, in the forward direction. This work addresses whether the IAA is sufficient for the typical modelling tasks in medical kilovoltage x-ray imaging. As a means of comparison, we incorporate a more realistic 'interference function' model into a custom-written Monte Carlo code. First, we conduct simulations of scatter from isolated voxels of soft tissue, adipose, cortical bone and spongiosa. Then, we simulate scatter profiles from a cylinder of water and from phantoms of a patient's head, thorax and pelvis, constructed from diagnostic-quality CT data sets. Lastly, we reconstruct CT numbers from simulated sets of projection images and investigate the quantitative effects of the approximation. We show that the IAA can produce errors of several per cent of the total scatter, across a projection image, for typical x-ray beams and patients. The errors in reconstructed CT number, however, for the phantoms simulated, were small (typically < 10 HU). The IAA can therefore be considered sufficient for the modelling of scatter correction in CT imaging. Where accurate quantitative estimates of scatter in individual projection images are required, however, the appropriate interference functions should be included.
Issue 22 (21 November 2009)
Received 5 August 2009, in final form 10 October 2009
Published 4 November 2009
G Poludniowski et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 6931
Abhay Ashtekar and Jerzy Lewandowski 2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18 L117
Anderson Janotti and Chris G Van de Walle 2009 Rep. Prog. Phys. 72 126501
K A Bronnikov et al 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 3389
Volker Grimm and Marlis Hochbruck 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 5495
Ishwaree P Neupane 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 5507
H R Wilson and J W Connor 2009 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51 115007
Christine D. Wilson et al. 2008 ApJS 178 189
S E Godfrey and G E Prince 1991 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 24 5465
Marceau Limousin et al. 2007 ApJ 668 643