S Vauclin et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 6901 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/22/010
S Vauclin1,2, K Doyeux1,2, S Hapdey1,3, A Edet-Sanson1,3, P Vera1,3 and I Gardin1,3
Show affiliationsAn iterative generic algorithm has been developed to compare three thresholding models used to delineate gross tumour volume on 18F-FDG PET images. 3D volume was extracted and characteristic parameters were measured. Three fitting models using different parameters were studied: model 1 (volume, contrast), model 2 (contrast) and model 3 (SUV). The calibration was performed using a cylindrical phantom filled with hot spheres. To validate the models, two other phantoms were used. The calibration procedure showed a better fitting model for model 1 (R2 from 0.94 to 1.00) than for model 3 (0.95) and model 2 (0.69). The validation study shows that model 3 yielded large volume measurement errors. Models 1 and 2 gave close results with no significant differences. Model 2 was preferred because it presents less error dispersion and needs fewer characteristic parameters, making it easier to implement. Our results show the importance of developing a generic algorithm to compare the performances of fitting models objectively and to validate results on other phantoms than the ones used during the calibration process to avoid methodological biases.
Issue 22 (21 November 2009)
Received 3 June 2009, in final form 6 October 2009
Published 28 October 2009
S Vauclin et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 6901
B. J. Wargelin et al. 2004 ApJ 607 596
T. Van Doorsselaere et al. 2004 ApJ 606 1223
E T Frantsuz et al 1996 Metrologia 33 189
Diederik Aerts and Marek Czachor 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 F259
Yan Wang et al. 2009 ApJ 705 1252
Stephan Rosswog et al 2009 ApJ 705 L128
H R Simonsen and F Rose 2000 Metrologia 37 651
R. Atkins et al. 2003 ApJ 595 803
Juna A. Kollmeier et al 2009 ApJ 705 L158