J Weichsel et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 4383 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/16/011
J Weichsel1,2, T Fuchs2, E Lefebvre3, E d'Humières4 and U Oelfke2
Show affiliationsLaser-induced particle accelerators have been recognized as a potential proton source for radiotherapeutic applications in recent years. However, there are still major difficulties—especially regarding the resulting proton spectra—to overcome for a successful application in the clinic. Here we elaborate on the physics of double-layer targets to propose a tentative 'optical gantry' setup. The spectral requirements for a quality dose deposition of the fast protons are estimated. Plasma simulations of the one-dimensional expansion of microstructured targets are performed according to various target dimensions, rear proton densities and substrate masses. Subsequently, the dependence of the resulting proton spectra on these parameters is evaluated and compared to previously published analytical considerations. Quasi-monoenergetic proton beams, which would be suitable for high-quality dose delivery, could be achieved from pure proton targets if one were able to select out the rear layer of those targets. However, much more realistic heavy substrate layered targets are not able to preserve this high spectral standard, partly due to a second Coulomb-expansion in the center-of-mass frame of the fast protons. This expansion can be mitigated by a reduction of the total positive charge in the rear layer, resulting in a comparable spectral quality as the previous target types. In conclusion, the promising spectral results as well as an estimation of the total number of fast protons which can be expected from such a setup, suggest that the introduction of laser-based proton accelerators into the clinic might be possible in the future.
Issue 16 (21 August 2008)
Received 1 April 2008, in final form 16 June 2008
Published 25 July 2008
J Weichsel et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 4383
Murthy S. Gudipati and Louis J. Allamandola 2006 ApJ 638 286
Yun Song et al 2000 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12 5275
Martin Sieber 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 L613
H Lei et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 7963
James M Nester 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 2751
John T Whelan et al 2000 Class. Quantum Grav. 17 4895
J. R. Brownstein and J. W. Moffat 2006 ApJ 636 721
Steve Arscott and David Troadec 2005 Nanotechnology 16 2295
I V Lindell et al 2001 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 34 2302