Helena Uusijärvi et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 4369 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/16/010
Helena Uusijärvi1, Peter Bernhardt and Eva Forssell-Aronsson
Show affiliationsNon-uniform radionuclide distribution in tumours will lead to a non-uniform absorbed dose. The aim of this study was to investigate how tumour control probability (TCP) depends on the radionuclide distribution in the tumour, both macroscopically and at the subcellular level. The absorbed dose in the cell nuclei of tumours was calculated for 90Y, 177Lu, 103mRh and 211At. The radionuclides were uniformly distributed within the subcellular compartment and they were uniformly, normally or log-normally distributed among the cells in the tumour. When all cells contain the same amount of activity, the cumulated activities required for TCP = 0.99
were 1.5–2 and 2–3 times higher when the activity was distributed on the cell membrane compared to in the cell nucleus for 103mRh and 211At, respectively. TCP for 90Y was not affected by different radionuclide distributions, whereas for 177Lu, it was slightly affected when the radionuclide was in the nucleus. TCP for 103mRh and 211At were affected by different radionuclide distributions to a great extent when the radionuclides were in the cell nucleus and to lesser extents when the radionuclides were distributed on the cell membrane or in the cytoplasm. When the activity was distributed in the nucleus,
increased when the activity distribution became more heterogeneous for 103mRh and 211At, and the increase was large when the activity was normally distributed compared to log-normally distributed. When the activity was distributed on the cell membrane,
was not affected for 103mRh and 211At when the activity distribution became more heterogeneous.
for 90Y and 177Lu were not affected by different activity distributions, neither macroscopic nor subcellular.
Issue 16 (21 August 2008)
Received 2 April 2008, in final form 19 June 2008
Published 25 July 2008
Helena Uusijärvi et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 4369
D Baye et al 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 225102
J Stötzel et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012153
Yue Song et al 2009 Chinese Phys. Lett. 26 117103
Young-Jin Choi et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 3775
F Maury et al 1986 J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 16 523
M Dubiel et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012123
M E Kelly et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 2607
Jungyeon Cho et al. 2003 ApJ 595 812
Samuel J. LaRoque et al. 2006 ApJ 652 917