Mike Oliver et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 N187 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/10/N03
Mike Oliver1, Robert Staruch2, Adam Gladwish1, Jeff Craig2, Jeff Chen1,2,3 and Eugene Wong1,2,3,4
Show affiliationsRespiratory gating is emerging as a tool to limit the effect of motion for liver and lung tumors. In order to study the impact of target motion and gated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery, a computer program was developed to simulate segmental IMRT delivery to a moving phantom. Two distinct plans were delivered to a rigid-motion phantom with a film insert in place under four conditions: static, sinusoidal motion, gated sinusoidal motion with a duty cycle of 25% and gated sinusoidal motion with duty cycle of 50% under motion conditions of a typical patient (A = 1 cm, T = 4 s). The MLC controller log files and gating log files were retained to perform a retrospective Monte Carlo dose calculation of the plans. Comparison of the 2D planar dose distributions between simulation and measurement demonstrated that our technique had at least 94% of the points passing gamma criteria of 3% for dose difference and 3 mm as the distance to agreement. This note demonstrates that the use of dynamic multi-leaf collimator and respiratory monitoring system log files together with a fast Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm is an accurate and efficient way to study the dosimetric effect of motion for gated or non-gated IMRT delivery on a rigidly-moving body.
87.53.Kn Conformal radiation treatment
Issue 10 (21 May 2008)
Received 7 February 2008, in final form 8 April 2008
Published 30 April 2008
Mike Oliver et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 N187
Yi-Huan Wei et al 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 6469
Wim Hordijk et al 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 3671
= 130 GeV
The STAR Collaboration et al 2007 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34 799
G. H. Herbig 2008 The Astronomical Journal 135 637
A S Shirinyan and M Wautelet 2004 Nanotechnology 15 1720
2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14
H Ikemoto et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012126
R Z Zhdanov et al 1993 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 26 5959
Genevieve J. Graves et al. 2007 ApJ 671 243