Yiannis Kyriakou et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 N175 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/10/N02
Yiannis Kyriakou, Michael Meyer and Willi A Kalender
Show affiliationsThe intensity and distribution of scatter is of growing interest in the case of flat-detector CT (FD-CT) scanners. It is generally assumed that scatter is an offset distribution dominated by incoherent scatter (Compton effect). Coherent and incoherent scatter were computed with respect to acquisition parameters used in FD-CT. A hybrid method optimized the performance of the scatter simulation: a fast and exact analytical calculation of the single-scatter intensity combined with a coarse Monte Carlo (MC) estimate of multiple scatter to reduce overall computational expenses, while assuring an acceptable signal quality. The simulation package allowed for the separation of both coherent and incoherent single scatter. For cylindrical water phantoms varying from 40 mm to 320 mm diameter and for various z-collimations an investigation of the ratio of single-to-total scatter was performed. The intensity distribution of scatter (including coherent single scatter, incoherent single scatter and total scatter) was computed for phantoms of 160 mm and 320 mm diameter and energies varying from 40 keV to 120 keV. Additionally, voxel phantoms were generated from clinical head and thorax CT datasets and were employed in scatter simulations to demonstrate the effect of coherent and incoherent single scatter on the 2D projections. Single scatter determines a significant fraction of total scatter even for large body-sized phantoms and large field of measurement. Coherent scatter dominates the distribution of total scatter for most of the simulated cases, even for 120 keV. The Compton effect appeared to be less influential with respect to spatial distribution but dominated the overall magnitude.
Issue 10 (21 May 2008)
Received 12 February 2008, in final form 18 March 2008
Published 25 April 2008
Yiannis Kyriakou et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 N175
Peng-Fei Hao et al 2005 J. Micromech. Microeng. 15 2069
Xin Liu et al. 2008 ApJ 678 758
D. John Hillier and D. L. Miller 1998 ApJ 496 407
R Jackiw et al 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 R327
Ali H Nayfeh and Mohammad I Younis 2004 J. Micromech. Microeng. 14 1711
Jun Liu et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 4739
Xuezhi Ke et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 6267
E. Daddi et al. 2004 ApJ 617 746
Oleg Y. Gnedin et al. 2005 ApJ 634 344