Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Interactively variable isotropic resolution in computed tomography

Robert M Lapp, Yiannis Kyriakou, Marc Kachelrieß, Sylvia Wilharm and Willi A Kalender

Show affiliations


An individual balancing between spatial resolution and image noise is necessary to fulfil the diagnostic requirements in medical CT imaging. In order to change influencing parameters, such as reconstruction kernel or effective slice thickness, additional raw-data-dependent image reconstructions have to be performed. Therefore, the noise versus resolution trade-off is time consuming and not interactively applicable. Furthermore, isotropic resolution, expressed by an equivalent point spread function (PSF) in every spatial direction, is important for the undistorted visualization and quantitative evaluation of small structures independent of the viewing plane. Theoretically, isotropic resolution can be obtained by matching the in-plane and through-plane resolution with the aforementioned parameters. Practically, however, the user is not assisted in doing so by current reconstruction systems and therefore isotropic resolution is not commonly achieved, in particular not at the desired resolution level. In this paper, an integrated approach is presented for equalizing the in-plane and through-plane spatial resolution by image filtering. The required filter kernels are calculated from previously measured PSFs in x/y- and z-direction. The concepts derived are combined with a variable resolution filtering technique. Both approaches are independent of CT raw data and operate only on reconstructed images which allows for their application in real time. Thereby, the aim of interactively variable, isotropic resolution is achieved. Results were evaluated quantitatively by measuring PSFs and image noise, and qualitatively by comparing the images to direct reconstructions regarded as the gold standard. Filtered images matched direct reconstructions with arbitrary reconstruction kernels with standard deviations in difference images of typically between 1 and 17 HU. Isotropic resolution was achieved within 5% of the selected resolution level. Processing times of 20–100 ms per frame allow for interactive use.


PACS

87.59.bd Computed radiography

87.57.N- Image analysis

87.57.C- Image quality

Subjects

Medical physics

Dates

Issue 10 (21 May 2008)

Received 1 February 2008, in final form 8 April 2008

Published 30 April 2008



  1. Interactively variable isotropic resolution in computed tomography

    Robert M Lapp et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 2693

  2. Isotopic quantum effects on the structure of low density amorphous ice

    J Urquidi et al 2003 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 3657

  3. Absorption spectrum in the wings of the potassium second resonance doublet broadened by helium

    François Shindo et al 2007 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 2841

  4. XMM-Newton Observations of PSR B1823–13: An Asymmetric Synchrotron Nebula around a Vela-like Pulsar

    B. M. Gaensler et al. 2003 ApJ 588 441

  5. A solid-state photovoltaic cell sensitized with a ruthenium bipyridyl complex

    K Tennakone et al 1998 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 31 1492

  6. Materials science and fabrication processes for a new MEMS technology based on ultrananocrystalline diamond thin films

    Orlando Auciello et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 R539

  7. Discrete variational Hamiltonian mechanics

    S Lall and M West 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 5509

  8. The Spitzer Deep, Wide-field Survey

    M. L. N. Ashby et al. 2009 ApJ 701 428

  9. Maximum entropy production and the fluctuation theorem

    R C Dewar 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 L371

  10. Series expansions for the percolation probability of a generalized Domany - Kinzel cellular automaton

    Iwan Jensen 1997 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 30 8471

Related review articles

What's this?
View review articles related to this research to gain an insight into the key trends in this subject area. Related review articles are selected based on PACS/MSC codes, and are no more than three years old.

  1. Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction?

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.