A J E Raaijmakers et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 7045 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/23/018
A J E Raaijmakers1, B Hårdemark2, B W Raaymakers1, C P J Raaijmakers1 and J J W Lagendijk1
Show affiliationsA combined system of a 6 MV linear accelerator and a 1.5 T MRI scanner is currently being developed. In this system, the patient will be irradiated in the presence of a 1.5 T magnetic field. This causes a strong dose increase at tissue–air interfaces. Around air cavities in the patient, these effects may become problematic. Homogeneous dose distributions can be obtained around regularly shaped symmetrical cavities using opposing beams. However, for more irregularly shaped cavities this approach may not be sufficient. This study will investigate whether IMRT can be used to cope with magnetic field dose effects, in particular for target volumes adjacent to irregularly shaped air cavities. Therefore, an inverse treatment planning approach has been designed based on pre-calculated beamlet dose distribution kernels. Using this approach, optimized dose distributions were calculated for B = 1.5 T and for B = 0 T. Investigated target sites include a prostate cancer, a laryngeal cancer and an oropharyngeal cancer. Differences in the dose distribution between B = 0 and 1.5 T were minimal; only the skin dose increased for B = 1.5 T. Homogeneous dose distributions were obtained for target structures adjacent to air cavities without the use of opposing beams. These results show that a 1.5 T magnetic field does not compromise the ability to achieve desired dose distributions with IMRT.
87.56.ng Wedges and compensators
Issue 23 (7 December 2007)
Received 30 August 2007, in final form 18 October 2007
Published 15 November 2007
A J E Raaijmakers et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 7045
M Blagojević and M Vasilić 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 3723
Juan Diego Urbina and Klaus Richter 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 L495
A D Whiteford et al 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 3179
Du Yu-Lei 2009 Chinese Phys. Lett. 26 117102
Y Gabellini and J -L Meunier 1992 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 25 3683
G.P. Maddison et al 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 125004
Klaus Behrndt and Dietmar Klemm 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 4107
J Beckers et al 1999 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 2791
V P Konchakovski et al 2009 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 36 125106