S Sourbron et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 429 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/2/009
S Sourbron1,2, M Dujardin2, S Makkat2 and R Luypaert2
Show affiliationsQuantification of haemodynamic parameters with a deconvolution analysis of bolus-tracking data is an ill-posed problem which requires regularization. In a previous study, simulated data without structural errors were used to validate two methods for a pixel-by-pixel analysis: standard-form Tikhonov regularization with either the L-curve criterion (LCC) or generalized cross validation (GCV) for selecting the regularization parameter. However, problems of image artefacts were reported when the methods were applied to patient data. The aim of this study was to investigate the nature of these problems in more detail and evaluate strategies of optimization for routine application in the clinic. In addition we investigated to which extent the calculation time of the algorithm can be minimized. In order to ensure that the conclusions are relevant for a larger range of clinical applications, we relied on patient data for evaluation of the algorithms. Simulated data were used to validate the conclusions in a more quantitative manner. We conclude that the reported problems with image quality can be removed by appropriate optimization of either LCC or GCV. In all examples this could be achieved with LCC without significant perturbation of the values in pixels where the regularization parameter was originally selected accurately. GCV could not be optimized for the renal data, and in the CT data only at the cost of image resolution. Using the implementations given, calculation times were sufficiently short for routine application in the clinic.
Issue 2 (21 January 2007)
Received 27 June 2006, in final form 27 October 2006
Published 29 December 2006
S Sourbron et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 429
F Muleri et al 2009 JINST 4 P11002
Shaowu Dong 2003 Metrologia 40 S249
D J Wagenaar et al 1991 Phys. Med. Biol. 36 61
Adolf Cortel 2005 Phys. Educ. 40 325
V M Nikolaenko 1981 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 14 1685
R Aldrovandi et al 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 51
R Willink 2007 Metrologia 44 182
Y Y Ye et al 2003 Nanotechnology 14 390
J Kovalevsky 1998 Rep. Prog. Phys. 61 77