Gernot Schmid et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 5457 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/17/024
Gernot Schmid1, Richard Überbacher1, Theodoros Samaras2, Manfred Tschabitscher3 and Peter R Mazal4
Show affiliationsIn order to enable a detailed analysis of radio frequency (RF) absorption in the human pineal gland, the dielectric properties of a sample of 20 freshly removed pineal glands were measured less than 20 h after death. Furthermore, a corresponding high resolution numerical model of the brain region surrounding the pineal gland was developed, based on a real human tissue sample. After inserting this model into a commercially available numerical head model, FDTD-based computations for exposure scenarios with generic models of handheld devices operated close to the head in the frequency range 400–1850 MHz were carried out. For typical output power values of real handheld mobile communication devices, the obtained results showed only very small amounts of absorbed RF power in the pineal gland when compared to SAR limits according to international safety standards. The highest absorption was found for the 400 MHz irradiation. In this case the RF power absorbed inside the pineal gland (organ mass 96 mg) was as low as 11 µW, when considering a device of 500 mW output power operated close to the ear. For typical mobile phone frequencies (900 MHz and 1850 MHz) and output power values (250 mW and 125 mW) the corresponding values of absorbed RF power in the pineal gland were found to be lower by a factor of 4.2 and 36, respectively. These results indicate that temperature-related biologically relevant effects on the pineal gland induced by the RF emissions of typical handheld mobile communication devices are unlikely.
87.50.S- Radiofrequency/microwave fields effects
84.40.-x Radiowave and microwave (including millimeter wave) technology
87.19.R- Mechanical and electrical properties of tissues and organs
Issue 17 (7 September 2007)
Received 19 April 2007, in final form 20 June 2007
Published 21 August 2007
Gernot Schmid et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 5457
L Sheiko et al 2002 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 1765
I H Duru 1995 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28 5883
J. J. Condon et al. 2002 The Astronomical Journal 124 675
Erin Ryan et al. 2001 ApJ 548 811
M Cacciatore et al 2004 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37 3379
Won Bong Choi et al 2004 Nanotechnology 15 S512
Bertrand Banos and Andrew Swann 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 3127
Nathaniel R. Butler and Daniel Kocevski 2007 ApJ 663 407
V Antipas et al 2001 Phys. Med. Biol. 46 2557