M Kohandel et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 3665 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/001
M Kohandel1,2, M Kardar3, M Milosevic4 and S Sivaloganathan1,2
Show affiliationsTumors cannot grow beyond a certain size (about 1–2 mm in diameter) through simple diffusion of oxygen and other essential nutrients into the tumor. Angiogenesis, the formation of blood vessels from pre-existing vessels, is a crucial and observed step, through which a tumor obtains its own blood supply. Thus, strategies that interfere with the development of this tumor vasculature, known as anti-angiogenic therapy, represent a novel approach to controlling tumor growth. Several pre-clinical studies have suggested that currently available angiogenesis inhibitors are unlikely to yield significant sustained improvements in tumor control on their own, but rather will need to be used in combination with conventional treatments to achieve maximal benefit. Optimal sequencing of anti-angiogenic treatment and radiotherapy or chemotherapy is essential to the success of these combined treatment strategies. Hence, a major challenge to mathematical modeling and computer simulations is to find appropriate dosages, schedules and sequencing of combination therapies to control or eliminate tumor growth. Here, we present a mathematical model that incorporates tumor cells and the vascular network, as well as their interplay. We can then include the effects of two different treatments, conventional cytotoxic therapy and anti-angiogenic therapy. The results are compared with available experimental and clinical data.
For more information on this article, see medicalphysicsweb.org
87.17.Aa Modeling, computer simulation of cell processes
87.53.-j Effects of ionizing radiation on biological systems
Issue 13 (7 July 2007)
Received 13 February 2007, in final form 13 April 2007
Published 24 May 2007
M Kohandel et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 3665
Ole G Mouritsen et al 2006 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18 S1293
C Vignal et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 2457
Lin Yan et al. 2005 ApJ 628 604
Naomi Hirano et al 2004 ApJ 616 L43
K Niinimäki et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 6663
S Redner 1985 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18 L723
Sun Yan et al 1988 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 21 1706
Erik Schnetter 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 4719
E. P. Mercer et al. 2007 ApJ 656 242