Paulo Crespo et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 2143 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/51/9/002
Paulo Crespo1, Georgy Shakirin1 and Wolfgang Enghardt1,2
Show affiliationsIn-beam positron emission tomography (in-beam PET) is currently the only method for an in situ monitoring of highly tumour-conformed charged hadron therapy. At the experimental carbon ion tumour therapy facility, running at the Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany, all treatments have been monitored by means of a specially adapted dual-head PET scanner. The positive clinical impact of this project triggered the construction of a hospital-based hadron therapy facility, with in-beam PET expected to monitor more delicate radiotherapeutic situations. Therefore, we have studied possible in-beam PET improvements by optimizing the arrangement of the γ-ray detectors. For this, a fully 3D, rebinning-free, maximum likelihood expectation maximization algorithm applicable to several closed-ring or dual-head tomographs has been developed. The analysis of β+-activity distributions simulated from real-treatment situations and detected with several detector arrangements allows us to conclude that a dual-head tomograph with narrow gaps yields in-beam PET images with sufficient quality for monitoring head and neck treatments. For monitoring larger irradiation fields, e.g. treatments in the pelvis region, a closed-ring tomograph was seen to be highly desirable. Finally, a study of the space availability for patient and bed, tomograph and beam portal proves the implementation of a closed-ring detector arrangement for in-beam PET to be feasible.
87.57.uk Positron emission tomography (PET)
02.70.Rr General statistical methods
07.85.Fv X- and gamma-ray sources, mirrors, gratings, and detectors
Issue 9 (7 May 2006)
Received 18 October 2005, in final form 10 February 2006
Published 11 April 2006
Paulo Crespo et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 2143
Cristiano Germani and Alex Kehagias JCAP11(2009)005
Jesenko Vukadinovic 2004 Nonlinearity 17 953
C W Gardiner et al 2002 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35 1555
C-M Ma et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 891
J P Sanchez et al 1992 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 4 9423
C S Edwards et al 2005 Metrologia 42 464
Matthew Wingate (for the HPQCD Collaboration) 2005 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 16 179
Leonard Rosenberg and Larry Spruch 2006 Phys. Scr. 73 C95
G Papastavrou and S Akari 1999 Nanotechnology 10 453