Z Chen et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 1393 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/51/6/002
Z Chen, C-M Ma, K Paskalev, J Li, J Yang, T Richardson, L Palacio, X Xu and L Chen
Show affiliationsMR imaging based treatment planning for radiotherapy of prostate cancer is limited due to MR imaging system related geometrical distortions, especially for patients with large body sizes. On our 0.23 T open scanner equipped with the gradient distortion correction (GDC) software, the residual image distortions after the GDC were <5 mm within the central 36 cm × 36 cm area for a standard 48 cm field of view (FOV). In order to use MR imaging alone for treatment planning the effect of residual MR distortions on external patient contour determination, especially for the peripheral regions outside the 36 cm × 36 cm area, must be investigated and corrected. In this work, we performed phantom measurements to quantify MR system related residual geometric distortions after the GDC and the effective FOV. Our results show that for patients with larger lateral dimensions (>36 cm), the differences in patient external contours between distortion-free CT images and GDC-corrected MR images were 1–2 cm because of the combination of greater gradient distortion and loss of field homogeneity away from the isocentre and the uncertainties in patient setup during CT and MRI scans. The measured distortion maps were used to perform point-by-point corrections for patients with large dimensions inside the effective FOV. Using the point-by-point method, the geometrical distortion after the GDC were reduced to <3 mm for external contour determination and the effective FOV was expanded from 36 cm to 42 cm.
Issue 6 (21 March 2006)
Received 12 September 2005, in final form 23 December 2005
Published 21 February 2006
Z Chen et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 1393
M Krüger et al 2003 New J. Phys. 5 138
Bhuvnesh Jain 2007 New J. Phys. 9
A L Kholmetskii 2006 Eur. J. Phys. 27 825
Shin'ichi Nojiri and Sergei D Odintsov 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 66 012005
Y Tsuji et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 191 012010
M Hilts et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 1727
Giovanni Arcioni et al JHEP07(2001)035
Matthew R Orton et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 2393
M Cortesi et al 2007 JINST 2 P09002