William T Shi et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 4031 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/51/16/010
William T Shi1,3, Flemming Forsberg1, Priya Vaidyanathan1,4, Audun Tornes2, Jonny Østensen2 and Barry B Goldberg1
Show affiliationsIn this study, the destruction of the contrast agent Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) was measured in vitro as a function of centre frequency (2–3 MHz), acoustic amplitude (0.66–1.6 MPa), pulse length (2–16 cycles) and PRF (0.5–8.0 kHz). Up to 82% of microbubbles were destroyed after exposure to a single 1.6 MPa acoustic pulse (16 cycles, 2.5 MHz and PRF of 1.0 kHz), while at a low amplitude of 0.66 MPa, fractional destruction increased gradually from 0 to 40% after exposure to 9 (identical) pulses. Fractional destruction increased from approximately 8 to 66% as pulse length was changed from 2 to 16 cycles following exposure to a single 2.5 MHz, 1.3 MPa pulse. As the PRF was increased from 0.5 to 8.0 kHz, shorter exposure time intervals (from 4.8 to 1.2 ms) were needed to achieve the same fractional destruction of 80%. Conversely, as the transmit frequency was increased from 2 to 3 MHz the fractional destruction decreased (by more than half within the first 3 pulses). The influence of changes in acoustic pressure and duty cycle on the destruction of Sonazoid microbubbles was highly statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01) with a threshold around 0.67 MPa for a duty cycle of 0.0064. In conclusion, the fractional destruction increases with the duty cycle and the acoustic pressure amplitude and decreases with ultrasonic transmit frequency. Better understanding of the influence of the ultrasound transmit parameters on the destruction of contrast microbubbles should help improve existing contrast-assisted imaging modalities and may help develop new techniques for better use of contrast agents.
43.80.Qf Medical diagnosis with acoustics (in PACS, see also 87.63.D−)
43.80.Vj Acoustical medical instrumentation and measurement techniques
43.35.Wa Biological effects of ultrasound, ultrasonic tomography
Issue 16 (21 August 2006)
Received 1 March 2006, in final form 15 June 2006
Published 2 August 2006
William T Shi et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 4031
Xianzhou Zhang et al 2003 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 36 4089
M Bruschi et al 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 475202
D J Raine and D W Sciama 1997 Class. Quantum Grav. 14 A325
Zhibin Lin and Roland E Allen 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 485503
Masamune Oguri et al. 2005 ApJ 622 106
J.E. Menard et al 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 S645
Yuhu Zhai and Mark D Bird 2008 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 21 115010
David Devine et al 2000 ApJ 540 L57
G Jarry and F Verhaegen 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 4977