J Hummel et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 N205 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/N01
J Hummel1,2, M Figl1, W Birkfellner1, M R Bax3, R Shahidi3, C R Maurer Jr3 and H Bergmann1,2
Show affiliationsThis note uses a published protocol to evaluate a newly released 6 degrees of freedom electromagnetic tracking system (Aurora, Northern Digital Inc.). A practice for performance monitoring over time is also proposed. The protocol uses a machined base plate to measure relative error in position and orientation as well as the influence of metallic objects in the operating volume. Positional jitter (ERMS) was found to be 0.17 mm ± 0.19 mm. A relative positional error of 0.25 mm ± 0.22 mm at 50 mm offsets and 0.97 mm ± 1.01 mm at 300 mm offsets was found. The mean of the relative rotation error was found to be 0.20° ± 0.14° with respect to the axial and 0.91° ± 0.68° for the longitudinal rotation. The most significant distortion caused by metallic objects is caused by 400-series stainless steel. A 9.4 mm maximum error occurred when the rod was closest to the emitter, 10 mm away. The improvement compared to older generations of the Aurora with respect to accuracy is substantial.
Issue 10 (21 May 2006)
Received 25 November 2005, in final form 27 November 2005
Published 27 April 2006
J Hummel et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 N205
M J Benacquista et al 2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18 4025
A. Ptak et al. 2003 ApJ 592 782
E Minguzzi et al 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 9591
Ross I Berbeco et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 3655
Murthy S. Gudipati et al. 2003 ApJ 583 514
Jun-Chen Su et al 1999 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 25 2325
Raymond R Raylman et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 6371
Yeong E Kim and Alexander L Zubarev 2005 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38 L243
B Cheal et al 2003 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 29 2479