Patrick L Chow et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 1837 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/8/014
Patrick L Chow1, Fernando R Rannou2 and Arion F Chatziioannou1
Show affiliationsAttenuation correction is one of the important corrections required for quantitative positron emission tomography (PET). This work will compare the quantitative accuracy of attenuation correction using a simple global scale factor with traditional transmission-based methods acquired either with a small animal PET or a small animal x-ray computed tomography (CT) scanner. Two phantoms (one mouse-sized and one rat-sized) and two animal subjects (one mouse and one rat) were scanned in CTI Concorde Microsystem's microPET® Focus™ for emission and transmission data and in ImTek's MicroCAT™ II for transmission data. PET emission image values were calibrated against a scintillation well counter. Results indicate that the scale factor method of attenuation correction places the average measured activity concentration about the expected value, without correcting for the cupping artefact from attenuation. Noise analysis in the phantom studies with the PET-based method shows that noise in the transmission data increases the noise in the corrected emission data. The CT-based method was accurate and delivered low-noise images suitable for both PET data correction and PET tracer localization.
87.57.uk Positron emission tomography (PET)
Issue 8 (21 April 2005)
Received 22 December 2004, in final form 17 February 2005
Published 6 April 2005
Patrick L Chow et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 1837
E Ascher and D Gay 1985 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18 397
W Sucksmith 1957 Br. J. Appl. Phys. 8 S24
Xinghua Xie et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 188 012003
John D Boice, Jr 2002 J. Radiol. Prot. 22 102
J Lowell 1979 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 12 1541
I A Elbakri et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 2171
Viatcheslav Kokoouline et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 192 012017
Rajesh A Kinhikar et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 1261
J G Edwards and S Gomulka 1979 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 12 187