M Sassowsky and E Pedroni 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 5381 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/22/011
M Sassowsky1 and E Pedroni2
Show affiliationsWater calorimetry is considered to be the most direct primary method to realize the physical quantity gray for absorbed dose to water. The Swiss Federal Office of Metrology and Accreditation (METAS) has routinely operated a water calorimeter as primary standard for photon radiation since 2001. Nowadays, cancer therapy with proton radiation has become increasingly important and is a well established method. In the framework of the ProScan project conducted by the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), the spot-scanning technique is prepared for the subsequent application in hospitals, and adjusted to the recent findings of clinical research. In the absence of primary standards for proton radiation, the metrological traceability is assured by calibrating secondary standards in 60Co radiation and correcting with calculated beam quality correction factors. It is internationally recognized that the development of primary standards for proton radiation is highly desirable. In a common project of PSI and METAS, it is investigated whether a modified version of the water calorimeter in operation at METAS is suitable as primary standard for scanned proton radiation. A feasibility study has been conducted to investigate the linear energy transfer (LET) dependence of the heat defect and the influence of the time and space structure of the scanned beam on the homogeneity and stability of the temperature field in the water calorimeter. Simulations are validated against experimental data of the existing calorimeter used with photon radiation and extended to scanned proton radiation.
Issue 22 (21 November 2005)
Received 11 June 2005, in final form 24 August 2005
Published 2 November 2005
M Sassowsky and E Pedroni 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 5381
K. Ohtsuka et al 2007 ApJ 668 L71
Ruth Gregory and Jeffrey A Harvey 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 L231
Itamar Sela and Doron Cohen 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 3575
Serge Demers and Paolo Battinelli 1998 The Astronomical Journal 115 154
T Ossowski et al 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 485002
G Oskam et al 1998 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 31 1927
Jon A. Morse et al. 2004 ApJ 614 727
A V Akimov et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 3445
Enrico Celeghini and Petr P Kulish 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 L211