A Ossadtchi et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 3447 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/14/017
A Ossadtchi1, J C Mosher2, W W Sutherling3, R E Greenblatt1 and R M Leahy4
Show affiliationsFor patients with partial epilepsy, automatic spike detection techniques applied to interictal MEG data often discover several potentially epileptogenic brain regions. An important determination in treatment planning is which of these detected regions are most likely to be the primary sources of epileptogenic activity. Analysis of the patterns of propagation activity between the detected regions may allow for detection of these primary epileptic foci. We describe the use of hidden Markov models (HMM) for estimation of the propagation patterns between several spiking regions from interictal MEG data. Analysis of the estimated transition probability matrix allows us to make inferences regarding the propagation pattern of the abnormal activity and determine the most likely region of its origin. The proposed HMM paradigm allows for a simple incorporation of the spike detector specificity and sensitivity characteristics. We develop bounds on performance for the case of perfect detection. We also apply the technique to simulated data sets in order to study the robustness of the method to the non-ideal specificity–sensitivity characteristics of the event detectors and compare results with the lower bounds. Our study demonstrates robustness of the proposed technique to event detection errors. We conclude with an example of the application of this method to a single patient.
87.80.-y Biophysical techniques (research methods)
87.50.C- Static and low-frequency electric and magnetic fields effects
Issue 14 (21 July 2005)
Received 17 February 2005, in final form 12 May 2005
Published 6 July 2005
A Ossadtchi et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 3447
Oliver Rudolph 2000 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 3951
M. D. P. Truch et al. 2008 ApJ 681 415
Ulrich Pinkall et al 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 12563
N Balkan et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 3457
F. Favata et al. 2005 ApJS 160 469
L. E. Snyder et al. 2005 ApJ 619 914
I. Baraffe et al 2009 ApJ 702 L27
Yan V Fyodorov and H-J Sommers 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 3303
Davide Lazzati et al 2000 ApJ 529 L17