Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Pre-irradiation effects on ionization chambers used in radiation therapy

J P McCaffrey1, B Downton1, H Shen1, D Niven2 and M McEwen1

Show affiliations


NOTE

Dosimetry protocols recommend that ionization chambers used in radiation therapy be pre-irradiated until they 'settle', i.e., until a stable reading is obtained. Previous reports have claimed that a lack of pre-irradiation could result in errors up to several per cent. Recently, data collected for a large number of commonly used ion chambers at the Institute for National Measurement Standards, NRC, Canada, have been collated and analysed, with additional data contributed by the National Physical Laboratory, UK. With this data set, it was possible to relate patterns of ion chamber behaviour to design parameters. While several mechanisms seem to contribute to this behaviour, the most obvious correlations implicate the type of insulator surrounding the central collector electrode, the extent of collector electrode shielding and possibly the area of the insulator exposed at the base of the active air volume. The results show that ion chambers with electrode connections guarded up to the active air volume settle quickly (~9 min) and the change in response is small (less than ~0.2%). For ion chambers where the guard connection surrounding the central collector does not extend up to the active air volume, settling times of 15–20 min and an associated change in response of up to 1% are typical. For some models of ion chambers, the irradiation rate may also play a role in settling behaviour. Settling times for the ion chambers studied here were found to be independent of beam quality.


PACS

87.56.Da Ancillary equipment

87.53.Bn Dosimetry/exposure assessment

87.55.N- Radiation monitoring, control, and safety

Subjects

Medical physics

Dates

Issue 13 (7 July 2005)

Received 12 March 2005, in final form 26 April 2005

Published 8 June 2005



  1. Pre-irradiation effects on ionization chambers used in radiation therapy

    J P McCaffrey et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 N121

  2. The Differential Emission Measure Distribution in the Multiloop Corona

    Markus J. Aschwanden 2002 ApJ 580 L79

  3. Applying dual-laser spot positions measurement technology on a two-dimensional tracking measurement system

    Hau-Wei Lee and Chieh-Li Chen 2009 Meas. Sci. Technol. 20 125103

  4. Chandra X-Ray Observation of the Orion Nebula Cluster. I. Detection, Identification, and Determination of X-Ray Luminosities

    E. Flaccomio et al. 2003 ApJ 582 382

  5. Magnetization profiles for a Ising strip with opposite surface fields

    A Maciolek 1996 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 29 3837

  6. Superselection sectors in the Ashtekar–Horowitz–Boulware model

    Jorma Louko and Alberto Molgado 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 4007

  7. Determination of a finite-range potential from discrete phase-shift data by inverse scattering

    T S Lo et al 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 9501

  8. Comment on 'Evidence of the gravitomagnetic field of Mars'

    Kris Krogh 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 5709

  9. Analysis of X(1576) as a Tetraquark State with the QCD Sum Rules

    Wang Zhi-Gang and Wan Shao-Long 2006 Chinese Phys. Lett. 23 3208

  10. Redshifts near black holes

    Adam D Helfer 2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18 5413

Related review articles

What's this?
View review articles related to this research to gain an insight into the key trends in this subject area. Related review articles are selected based on PACS/MSC codes, and are no more than three years old.

  1. The concept and challenges of TomoTherapy accelerators

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.