Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Benchmark of PENELOPE code for low-energy photon transport: dose comparisons with MCNP4 and EGS4

Sung-Joon Ye1, Ivan A Brezovich1, Prem Pareek1 and Shahid A Naqvi2

Show affiliations


The expanding clinical use of low-energy photon emitting 125I and 103Pd seeds in recent years has led to renewed interest in their dosimetric properties. Numerous papers pointed out that higher accuracy could be obtained in Monte Carlo simulations by utilizing newer libraries for the low-energy photon cross-sections, such as XCOM and EPDL97. The recently developed PENELOPE 2001 Monte Carlo code is user friendly and incorporates photon cross-section data from the EPDL97. The code has been verified for clinical dosimetry of high-energy electron and photon beams, but has not yet been tested at low energies. In the present work, we have benchmarked the PENELOPE code for 10–150 keV photons. We computed radial dose distributions from 0 to 10 cm in water at photon energies of 10–150 keV using both PENELOPE and MCNP4C with either DLC-146 or DLC-200 cross-section libraries, assuming a point source located at the centre of a 30 cm diameter and 20 cm length cylinder. Throughout the energy range of simulated photons (except for 10 keV), PENELOPE agreed within statistical uncertainties (at worst ±5%) with MCNP/DLC-146 in the entire region of 1–10 cm and with published EGS4 data up to 5 cm. The dose at 1 cm (or dose rate constant) of PENELOPE agreed with MCNP/DLC-146 and EGS4 data within approximately ±2% in the range of 20–150 keV, while MCNP/DLC-200 produced values up to 9% lower in the range of 20–100 keV than PENELOPE or the other codes. However, the differences among the four datasets became negligible above 100 keV.


PACS

87.53.Bn Dosimetry/exposure assessment

87.55.Gh Simulation

87.55.K- Monte Carlo methods

Subjects

Medical physics

Dates

Issue 3 (7 February 2004)

Received 15 October 2003

Published 16 January 2004



  1. Benchmark of PENELOPE code for low-energy photon transport: dose comparisons with MCNP4 and EGS4

    Sung-Joon Ye et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 387

  2. The pseudogap in high-temperature superconductors: an experimental survey

    Tom Timusk and Bryan Statt 1999 Rep. Prog. Phys. 62 61

  3. Strongly non-Gaussian statistics of optical soliton parameters due to collisions in the presence of delayed Raman response

    Yeojin Chung and Avner Peleg 2005 Nonlinearity 18 1555

  4. Swift pointing and gravitational-wave bursts from gamma-ray burst events

    Patrick J Sutton et al 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 S815

  5. An ultracool Star's Candidate Planet

    Steven H. Pravdo and Stuart B. Shaklan 2009 ApJ 700 623

  6. The Proposed Giant Planet Orbiting VB 10 Does Not Exist

    Jacob L. Bean et al. 2010 ApJ 711 L19

  7. Using concept mapping for assessment in physics

    Lydia B Austin and Bruce M Shore 1995 Phys. Educ. 30 41

  8. Enhanced atomic Kerr nonlinearity in bright coherent states

    A M Akulshin et al 2004 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 6 491

  9. Reading Hertz's own dipole theory

    B A Aničin 2008 Eur. J. Phys. 29 15

  10. An approach to achieving a negative index of refraction using coincident resonances

    S D Kirby et al 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 1161

Users also read

What's this?
This innovative new feature generates a list of articles 'also read' by other users based on them reading the original article. Article abstracts citations and references are all considered and weighted accordingly. We hope that this will help you find relevant papers for your research.

  1. An analysis of MCNP cross-sections and tally methods for low-energy photon emitters
  2. Comparison of GATE/GEANT4 with EGSnrc and MCNP for electron dose calculations at energies between 15 keV and 20 MeV

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.