Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Measurement of coherent x-ray scatter form factors for amorphous materials using diffractometers

Paul C Johns1,2 and Matthew P Wismayer1

Show affiliations


The feasibility of measuring the coherent x-ray scatter form factors of amorphous materials using powder diffractometers has been assessed. A five-step procedure was developed: (i) Low-angle background, consisting of a portion of the incident x-ray beam that passes directly to the detector, is measured using a specially designed replacement for the sample holder which absorbs most of the photons that otherwise would scatter off the sample holder cavity. (ii) Angle-dependent effects including monochromator efficiency and projected beam area are characterized by extracting the incoherent signal from the diffraction pattern of powdered graphite. The incoherent signal divided by the calculated incoherent cross section gives a correction factor as a function of scattering angle θ. (iii) Diffraction patterns are measured for the samples for θ = 2°–150°. (iv) The scattering data are corrected for background and then for angle-dependent effects. (v) The data are normalized to calculated free atom form factors at high θ, and the coherent form factor extracted. The method was implemented on two diffractometers at different energies (Co Kα and Cu Kα), and the results compared for water and plastics. Over the range 0.117 < x < 5.39 nm−1, where x = λ−1 sin(θ/2), the average form factor ratio for water was 0.93. Systematic errors are difficult to eliminate. While this x-ray powder diffractometer technique suffices for a survey measurement of the form factor of a material, its accuracy is probably insufficient for detailed studies.


PACS

87.59.-e X-ray imaging

07.85.Jy Diffractometers

61.05.cp X-ray diffraction

Subjects

Instrumentation and measurement

Medical physics

Dates

Issue 23 (7 December 2004)

Received 12 July 2004, in final form 4 October 2004

Published 10 November 2004



  1. Measurement of coherent x-ray scatter form factors for amorphous materials using diffractometers

    Paul C Johns and Matthew P Wismayer 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 5233

  2. Ultrafast quasi-particle dynamics of charge/orbital ordered and ferromagnetic clusters in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3

    Y H Ren et al 2009 New J. Phys. 11 113013

  3. On the feasibility of water calorimetry with scanned proton radiation

    M Sassowsky and E Pedroni 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 5381

  4. Apollo Asteroids 1566 Icarus and 2007 MK6: Icarus Family Members?

    K. Ohtsuka et al 2007 ApJ 668 L71

  5. Spacetime decay of cones at strong coupling

    Ruth Gregory and Jeffrey A Harvey 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 L231

  6. Operating a quantum pump in a closed circuit

    Itamar Sela and Doron Cohen 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 3575

  7. The Young Intercloud Population. I. Distances and Ages

    Serge Demers and Paolo Battinelli 1998 The Astronomical Journal 115 154

  8. Effect of iron additions on intergranular cohesion in chromium

    T Ossowski et al 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 485002

  9. Electrochemical deposition of metals onto silicon

    G Oskam et al 1998 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 31 1927

  10. Location of the Optical Reverse Shock in the Cassiopeia A Supernova Remnant

    Jon A. Morse et al. 2004 ApJ 614 727

Related review articles

What's this?
View review articles related to this research to gain an insight into the key trends in this subject area. Related review articles are selected based on PACS/MSC codes, and are no more than three years old.

  1. Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction?

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.