Jerry Wong et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 3539 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/16/003
Jerry Wong, Tong Xu, Adeel Husain, Huy Le and Sabee Molloi
Show affiliationsIn mammography, thick or dense breast regions persistently suffer from reduced contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) because of degraded contrast from large scatter intensities and relatively high noise. Area x-ray beam equalization can improve image quality by increasing the x-ray exposure to under-penetrated regions without increasing the exposure to other breast regions. Optimal equalization parameters with respect to image quality and patient dose were determined through computer simulations and validated with experimental observations on a step phantom and an anthropomorphic breast phantom. Three parameters important in equalization digital mammography were considered: attenuator material (Z = 13–92), beam energy (22–34 kVp) and equalization level. A Mo/Mo digital mammography system was used for image acquisition. A prototype 16 × 16 piston driven equalization system was used for preparing patient-specific equalization masks. Simulation studies showed that a molybdenum attenuator and an equalization level of 20 were optimal for improving contrast, CNR and figure of merit (FOM = CNR2/dose). Experimental measurements using these parameters showed significant improvements in contrast, CNR and FOM. Moreover, equalized images of a breast phantom showed improved image quality. These results indicate that area beam equalization can improve image quality in digital mammography.
Issue 16 (21 August 2004)
Received 13 April 2004
Published 2 August 2004
Jerry Wong et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 3539
C S G Cousins 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 5091
P Sharma et al 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 485902
Carlos G. Román-Zúñiga et al. 2009 ApJ 704 183
Rudy Wijnands et al 2004 ApJ 606 L61
A Garofalakis et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 2583
L H Ryder 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 9729
Satyabrata Adhikari and Binayak S Choudhury 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 11877
P. Papini et al. 2004 ApJ 615 259
P H Butler and M F Reid 1979 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 12 1655