A Cot et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 3125 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/14/007
A Cot1, J Sempau2, D Pareto3, S Bullich3, J Pavía4,5, F Calviño1 and D Ros3,5
Show affiliationsThe iterative reconstruction algorithms employed in brain single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) allow some quantitative parameters of the image to be improved. These algorithms require accurate modelling of the so-called point spread function (PSF). Nowadays, most in vivo neurotransmitter SPECT studies employ pharmaceuticals radiolabelled with 123I. In addition to an intense line at 159 keV, the decay scheme of this radioisotope includes some higher energy gammas which may have a non-negligible contribution to the PSF. The aim of this work is to study this contribution for two low-energy high-resolution collimator configurations, namely, the parallel and the fan beam. The transport of radiation through the material system is simulated with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. We have developed a main program that deals with the intricacies associated with tracking photon trajectories through the geometry of the collimator and detection systems. The simulated PSFs are partly validated with a set of experimental measurements that use the 511 keV annihilation photons emitted by a 18F source. Sensitivity and spatial resolution have been studied, showing that a significant fraction of the detection events in the energy window centred at 159 keV (up to approximately 49% for the parallel collimator) are originated by higher energy gamma rays, which contribute to the spatial profile of the PSF mostly outside the 'geometrical' region dominated by the low-energy photons. Therefore, these high-energy counts are to be considered as noise, a fact that should be taken into account when modelling PSFs for reconstruction algorithms. We also show that the fan beam collimator gives higher signal-to-noise ratios than the parallel collimator for all the source positions analysed.
Issue 14 (21 July 2004)
Received 19 February 2004
Published 28 June 2004
A Cot et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 3125
G J Kim et al 2006 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 4386
J P J Michels and F W Wiegel 1989 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22 2393
M A Andreata and V V Dodonov 2000 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 3209
Lynne A. Hillenbrand and Russel J. White 2004 ApJ 604 741
Joris Vankerschaver 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 3889
A Braem et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 2547
G Fiumara and P V Giaquinta 1994 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 27 4351
Xiao-shen Li 1984 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 17 2747
D N McIlroy et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 L359