Mark F Smith et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 2437 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/11/022
Mark F Smith1, Raymond R Raylman2, Stan Majewski1 and Andrew G Weisenberger1
Show affiliationsPositron emission mammography (PEM) with tomographic acquisition using dual planar detectors rotating about the breast can obtain complete angular sampling and has the potential to improve activity estimation compared with PEM using stationary detectors. PEM tomography (PEMT) was compared with stationary PEM for point source and compressed breast phantom studies performed with a compact dual detector system. The acquisition geometries were appropriate for the target application of PEM guidance of stereotactic core biopsy. Images were reconstructed with a three-dimensional iterative maximum likelihood expectation maximization algorithm. PEMT eliminated blurring normal to the detectors seen with stationary PEM. Depth of interaction effects distorted the shape of the point spread functions for PEMT as the angular range from normal incidence of lines of response used in image reconstruction increased. Streak artefacts in PEMT for large detector rotation increments led to the development of an expression for the maximum rotation increment that maintains complete angular sampling. Studies with a compressed breast phantom were used to investigate contrast and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) trade-offs for different sized spherical tumour models. PEMT and PEM both had advantages depending on lesion size and detector separation. The most appropriate acquisition method for specific detection or quantitation tasks requires additional investigation.
87.57.uk Positron emission tomography (PET)
02.50.-r Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics
Issue 11 (7 June 2004)
Received 27 October 2003
Published 19 May 2004
Mark F Smith et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 2437
Eugene Butikov 2006 Eur. J. Phys. 27 1071
Yuping He and Yiping Zhao 2009 Nanotechnology 20 204008
G. Aulanier et al 2002 ApJ 567 L97
Narayan Poudyal et al 2004 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37 L45
X S Peng et al 2002 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 L101
José M Soler et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 2745
S L Haan et al 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 134009
Michael C MacCracken 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 045107
P J Masson et al 2007 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 20 748