E Fourkal et al 2003 Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3977 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/48/24/001
E Fourkal, J S Li, W Xiong, A Nahum and C-M Ma
Show affiliationsIn this paper we present Monte Carlo studies of intensity modulated radiation therapy using laser-accelerated proton beams. Laser-accelerated protons coming out of a solid high-density target have broad energy and angular spectra leading to dose distributions that cannot be directly used for therapeutic applications. Through the introduction of a spectrometer-like particle selection system that delivers small pencil beams of protons with desired energy spectra it is feasible to use laser-accelerated protons for intensity modulated radiotherapy. The method presented in this paper is a three-dimensional modulation in which the proton energy spectrum and intensity of each individual beamlet are modulated to yield a homogeneous dose in both the longitudinal and lateral directions. As an evaluation of the efficacy of this method, it has been applied to two prostate cases using a variety of beam arrangements. We have performed a comparison study between intensity modulated photon plans and those for laser-accelerated protons. For identical beam arrangements and the same optimization parameters, proton plans exhibit superior coverage of the target and sparing of neighbouring critical structures. Dose–volume histogram analysis of the resulting dose distributions shows up to 50% reduction of dose to the critical structures. As the number of fields is decreased, the proton modality exhibits a better preservation of the optimization requirements on the target and critical structures. It is shown that for a two-beam arrangement (parallel-opposed) it is possible to achieve both superior target coverage with 5% dose inhomogeneity within the target and excellent sparing of surrounding tissue.
87.53.Bn Dosimetry/exposure assessment
Issue 24 (21 December 2003)
Received 29 July 2003
Published 5 December 2003
E Fourkal et al 2003 Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3977
R Twarock 1999 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 4971
E. Schinnerer et al. 2000 ApJ 533 826
Po-Jian Chiu et al. 2006 ApJ 645 605
T. Sakamoto et al. 2004 ApJ 602 875
Koujin Takeda et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 3751
P Catravas et al 2001 Meas. Sci. Technol. 12 1828
R. Atkins et al. 2003 ApJ 595 803
B. Sargent et al. 2006 ApJ 645 395
E A Hinds and I G Hughes 1999 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 32 R119