S S Vedam et al 2003 Phys. Med. Biol. 48 45 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/48/1/304
S S Vedam1,2, P J Keall2, V R Kini2, H Mostafavi3, H P Shukla4 and R Mohan5
Show affiliationsFour-dimensional (4D) methods strive to achieve highly conformal radiotherapy, particularly for lung and breast tumours, in the presence of respiratory-induced motion of tumours and normal tissues. Four-dimensional radiotherapy accounts for respiratory motion during imaging, planning and radiation delivery, and requires a 4D CT image in which the internal anatomy motion as a function of the respiratory cycle can be quantified. The aims of our research were (a) to develop a method to acquire 4D CT images from a spiral CT scan using an external respiratory signal and (b) to examine the potential utility of 4D CT imaging. A commercially available respiratory motion monitoring system provided an 'external' tracking signal of the patient's breathing. Simultaneous recording of a TTL 'X-Ray ON' signal from the CT scanner indicated the start time of CT image acquisition, thus facilitating time stamping of all subsequent images. An over-sampled spiral CT scan was acquired using a pitch of 0.5 and scanner rotation time of 1.5 s. Each image from such a scan was sorted into an image bin that corresponded with the phase of the respiratory cycle in which the image was acquired. The complete set of such image bins accumulated over a respiratory cycle constitutes a 4D CT dataset. Four-dimensional CT datasets of a mechanical oscillator phantom and a patient undergoing lung radiotherapy were acquired. Motion artefacts were significantly reduced in the images in the 4D CT dataset compared to the three-dimensional (3D) images, for which respiratory motion was not accounted. Accounting for respiratory motion using 4D CT imaging is feasible and yields images with less distortion than 3D images. 4D images also contain respiratory motion information not available in a 3D CT image.
Issue 1 (7 January 2003)
Received 10 July 2002, in final form 24 October 2002
Published 16 December 2002
S S Vedam et al 2003 Phys. Med. Biol. 48 45
Jeremy C Hebden et al 2002 Phys. Med. Biol. 47 4155
H-P Müller et al 1999 Phys. Med. Biol. 44 105
M Boutillon 1998 Phys. Med. Biol. 43 2061
M Boutillon and A -M Perroche 1993 Phys. Med. Biol. 38 439
K R Shortt et al 1993 Phys. Med. Biol. 38 1937
S Tavernier et al 1992 Phys. Med. Biol. 37 635
C P Oates 1991 Phys. Med. Biol. 36 1433
M Boutillon and A M Perroche-Roux 1987 Phys. Med. Biol. 32 213
T R Overton and P R J Burch 1966 Phys. Med. Biol. 11 47