K Jerbi et al 2002 Phys. Med. Biol. 47 523 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/47/4/301
K Jerbi1,2, J C Mosher3, S Baillet2 and R M Leahy1
Show affiliationsMagnetoencephalography (MEG) is a non-invasive functional imaging modality based on the measurement of the external magnetic field produced by neural current sources within the brain. The reconstruction of the underlying sources is a severely ill-posed inverse problem typically tackled using either low-dimensional parametric source models, such as an equivalent current dipole (ECD), or high-dimensional minimum-norm imaging techniques. The inability of the ECD to properly represent non-focal sources and the over-smoothed solutions obtained by minimum-norm methods underline the need for an alternative approach. Multipole expansion methods have the advantages of the parametric approach while at the same time adequately describing sources with significant spatial extent and arbitrary activation patterns. In this paper we first present a comparative review of spherical harmonic and Cartesian multipole expansion methods that can be used in MEG. The equations are given for the general case of arbitrary conductors and realistic sensor configurations and also for the special cases of spherically symmetric conductors and radially oriented sensors. We then report the results of computer simulations used to investigate the ability of a first-order multipole model (dipole and quadrupole) to represent spatially extended sources, which are simulated by 2D and 3D clusters of elemental dipoles. The overall field of a cluster is analysed using singular value decomposition and compared to the unit fields of a multipole, centred in the middle of the cluster, using subspace correlation metrics. Our results demonstrate the superior utility of the multipolar source model over ECD models in providing source representations of extended regions of activity.
87.50.C- Static and low-frequency electric and magnetic fields effects
92C55 Biomedical imaging and signal processing (See also 44A12, 65R10)
15A18 Eigenvalues, singular values, and eigenvectors
41A58 Series expansions (e.g. Taylor, Lidstone series, but not Fourier series)
Issue 4 (21 February 2002)
Received 2 August 2001
Published 1 February 2002
K Jerbi et al 2002 Phys. Med. Biol. 47 523
G V Avakov et al 1992 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 25 213
C A Massone et al 2003 Metrologia 40 206
Clifford J Nolan et al 2006 Inverse Problems 22 1817
B Alterkop et al 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 552
I Sauers and G Harman 1992 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 25 761
V D Huynh 1992 Metrologia 29 295
L Baggio et al 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 1541
Alan L Andrew 2005 Inverse Problems 21 223
Iwan Jensen 2006 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 42 163