John J Ermer et al 2001 Phys. Med. Biol. 46 1265 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/46/4/324
John J Ermer1,2, John C Mosher3, Sylvain Baillet4 and Richard M Leahy5,6
Show affiliationsWith the increasing availability of surface extraction techniques for magnetic resonance and x-ray computed tomography images, realistic head models can be readily generated as forward models in the analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. Inverse analysis of this data, however, requires that the forward model be computationally efficient. We propose two methods for approximating the EEG forward model using realistic head shapes. The `sensor-fitted sphere' approach fits a multilayer sphere individually to each sensor, and the `three-dimensional interpolation' scheme interpolates using a grid on which a numerical boundary element method (BEM) solution has been precomputed. We have characterized the performance of each method in terms of magnitude and subspace error metrics, as well as computational and memory requirements. We have also made direct performance comparisons with traditional spherical models. The approximation provided by the interpolative scheme had an accuracy nearly identical to full BEM, even within 3 mm of the inner skull surface. Forward model computation during inverse procedures was approximately 30 times faster than for a traditional three-shell spherical model. Cast in this framework, high-fidelity numerical solutions currently viewed as computationally prohibitive for solving the inverse problem (e.g. linear Galerkin BEM) can be rapidly recomputed in a highly efficient manner. The sensor-fitting method has a similar one-time cost to the BEM method, and while it produces some improvement over a standard three-shell sphere, its performance does not approach that of the interpolation method. In both methods, there is a one-time cost associated with precomputing the forward solution over a set of grid points.
87.19.R- Mechanical and electrical properties of tissues and organs
87.80.-y Biophysical techniques (research methods)
87.10.-e General theory and mathematical aspects
02.60.Lj Ordinary and partial differential equations; boundary value problems
Issue 4 (April 2001)
Received 17 November 2000
John J Ermer et al 2001 Phys. Med. Biol. 46 1265
M A Lohe 1977 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 10 525
F Delahaye and B Jeckelmann 2003 Metrologia 40 217
Ricardo Weder 2002 Inverse Problems 18 1041
A V Golovnev and L V Prokhorov 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 2765
G. H. Rieke et al. 2004 ApJS 154 25
A Bäcker et al 2002 Nonlinearity 15 1417
B G Gokhale and S N Shukla 1970 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 3 1392
Li Xumo et al 1982 Metrologia 18 203
B Hohler and H Schreyer 1982 J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 12 857