I Henderson et al 1993 Phys. Med. Biol. 38 1611 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/38/11/006
I Henderson, J R Jago, K Willson and T A Whittingham
Show affiliationsThe Northern Regional Medical Physics Department has been involved in measurement of the acoustic output of diagnostic ultrasound equipment for several years. As the complexity of diagnostic ultrasound equipment has increased, so have the problems of measuring the acoustic outputs of this equipment in the field. Measurements made in the field are often made on unfamiliar pieces of equipment and under tight constraints of time. In these circumstances the magnitude and the conditions under which the true maximum Ispta value occurs may not always be found. The aim of a measurement protocol is therefore to facilitate the measurement of Ispta in the field, so that the measured maximum Ispta value is as close as possible to the 'true maximum' Ispta value. To be of practical benefit the protocol must be succinct and easy to use, as well as applicable to most if not all types of scanner. Our experience has led us to believe that this is possible and that the benefits of a well designed measurement protocol will far outweigh any disadvantages. The development of two measurement protocols is discussed in this paper. The time required to carry out each measurement depends on the number of assumptions made about the operation of the scanner in the protocol used. The first protocol makes very few assumptions about the operation of a scanner; the results from measurements made using this protocol can be used to assess the validity of the much larger number of assumptions made in the second protocol. The results from measurements on three types of scanner using the two protocols are presented. The results demonstrate the validity of most of the assumptions made by the protocols and the potential benefits of using a protocol for measurement of maximum Ispta in the field in terms of reduced measurement time and greater consistency.
43.80.Qf Medical diagnosis with acoustics (in PACS, see also 87.63.D−)
43.80.Vj Acoustical medical instrumentation and measurement techniques
Issue 11 (November 1993)
I Henderson et al 1993 Phys. Med. Biol. 38 1611
P S Atherton 1987 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 20 L591
M J Davis et al 1999 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 32 3993
I S Tereshina et al 2001 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 8161
M Klewer et al 1979 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 12 L525
Laura I Cerviño et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 6853
Luis Barreira and Paulo Doutor 2009 Nonlinearity 22 2761
Sergei A Voloshin (for the STAR Collaboration) 2007 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34 S883
Marcin Domagala and Jerzy Lewandowski 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 5233
John T Whelan et al 2000 Class. Quantum Grav. 17 4895