M.N.A. Beurskens et al 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 125006 doi:10.1088/0029-5515/49/12/125006
M.N.A. Beurskens1,9, A. Alfier2, B. Alper1, I. Balboa1, J. Flanagan1, W. Fundamenski1, E. Giovannozzi3, M. Kempenaars1, A. Loarte6, P. Lomas1, E. de La Luna4, I. Nunes7, R. Pasqualotto2, R.A. Pitts6, G. Saibene8, M. Walsh1, S. Wiesen5 and JET-EFDA contributors
Show affiliationsPedestal and scrape-off layer (SOL) dynamics due to edge localized modes (ELMs) have been studied on JET with improved diagnostic capability. The new high resolution Thomson scattering system enables detailed measurement of the space and time evolution of the Te and ne pedestal profiles. The pedestal and SOL dynamics for type I ELMy H-mode plasmas have been studied for a wide range of plasma conditions. During a short period of <200 µs after the ELM event radial profiles of filaments in the SOL electron density and temperature have been observed. After that period the SOL density is increased and remains high for several milliseconds. During the same period the electron temperature shows no increase compared with the pre-ELM values. This SOL dynamics has been observed for a wide range of plasma parameters and is independent of plasma pedestal collisionality. For the first time on JET the convective and conductive ELM energy losses have been quantified using the new kinetic profile measurements. The findings provide detailed confirmation of earlier observations based on different measurements and analysis. The pedestal region perturbed by the ELM is the same for both density and temperature and the ELM effect extends up to about 20% of minor radius. The convective energy losses do not vary significantly and are ~5% of the pedestal stored energy (Wped) over a large range of pedestal collisionality
from below
to above
whereas the conductive losses strongly decrease from ~20% of Wped to 5% of Wped with increasing
. The experimental observations are compared with a simple model based on losses being driven by parallel transport.
52.55.Fa Tokamaks, spherical tokamaks
28.52.Lf Components and instrumentation
52.70.-m Plasma diagnostic techniques and instrumentation
52.40.Hf Plasma-material interactions; boundary layer effects
Issue 12 (December 2009)
Received 22 May 2009, accepted for publication 17 September 2009
Published 10 November 2009
M.N.A. Beurskens et al 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 125006
X W Zhao et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 485608
Roger Penrose 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 174 012001
Donato Bini et al 2009 Class. Quantum Grav. 26 225006
Jia Zhang et al 2009 Nanotechnology 20 295603
Maki Hata et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 189 012019
Xiaobin Fan et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 195103
M Okunishi et al 2008 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 201004
S Deschanel et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 214001
Yueqiang Liu et al 2009 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51 115005