C.E. Kessel et al 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 1274 doi:10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/026
C.E. Kessel1, G. Giruzzi2, A.C.C. Sips3, R.V. Budny1, J.F. Artaud2, V. Basiuk2, F. Imbeaux2, E. Joffrin2, M. Schneider2, M. Murakami4, T. Luce5, Holger St John5, T. Oikawa6, N. Hayashi7, T. Takizuka7, T. Ozeki7, Y.-S. Na8, J.M. Park8, J. Garcia9 and A.A. Tucillo10
Show affiliationsIntegrated simulations are performed to establish a physics basis, in conjunction with present tokamak experiments, for the operating modes in the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER). Simulations of the hybrid mode are done using both fixed and free-boundary 1.5D transport evolution codes including CRONOS, ONETWO, TSC/TRANSP, TOPICS and ASTRA. The hybrid operating mode is simulated using the GLF23 and CDBM05 energy transport models. The injected powers are limited to the negative ion neutral beam, ion cyclotron and electron cyclotron heating systems. Several plasma parameters and source parameters are specified for the hybrid cases to provide a comparison of 1.5D core transport modelling assumptions, source physics modelling assumptions, as well as numerous peripheral physics modelling. Initial results indicate that very strict guidelines will need to be imposed on the application of GLF23, for example, to make useful comparisons. Some of the variations among the simulations are due to source models which vary widely among the codes used. In addition, there are a number of peripheral physics models that should be examined, some of which include fusion power production, bootstrap current, treatment of fast particles and treatment of impurities. The hybrid simulations project to fusion gains of 5.6–8.3, βN values of 2.1–2.6 and fusion powers ranging from 350 to 500 MW, under the assumptions outlined in section 3. Simulations of the steady state operating mode are done with the same 1.5D transport evolution codes cited above, except the ASTRA code. In these cases the energy transport model is more difficult to prescribe, so that energy confinement models will range from theory based to empirically based. The injected powers include the same sources as used for the hybrid with the possible addition of lower hybrid. The simulations of the steady state mode project to fusion gains of 3.5–7, βN values of 2.3–3.0 and fusion powers of 290 to 415 MW, under the assumptions described in section 4. These simulations will be presented and compared with particular focus on the resulting temperature profiles, source profiles and peripheral physics profiles. The steady state simulations are at an early stage and are focused on developing a range of safety factor profiles with 100% non-inductive current.
52.55.Fa Tokamaks, spherical tokamaks
52.50.Qt Plasma heating by radio-frequency fields; ICR, ICP, helicons
52.55.Pi Fusion products effects (e.g., alpha-particles, etc.), fast particle effects
Issue 9 (September 2007)
Received 30 January 2007, in final form 3 July 2007
Published 29 August 2007
C.E. Kessel et al 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 1274
Changxin Chen et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 2192
Liu Zugang et al 1996 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8 3221
Tristan Hübsch 1999 Class. Quantum Grav. 16 L51
T Li et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 253
W H Emerson 2004 Metrologia 41 L33
G. Platania and R. Rosania 1997 Europhys. Lett. 37 585
P Weinberger et al 1996 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8 7677
John D Barrow and Hideo Kodama 2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18 1753
Joaquim Anacleto and Joaquim Alberto C Anacleto 2008 Eur. J. Phys. 29 555