D.A. Spong et al 2001 Nucl. Fusion 41 711 doi:10.1088/0029-5515/41/6/305
D.A. Sponga, S.P. Hirshmana, L.A. Berrya, J.F. Lyona, R.H. Fowlera, D.J. Stricklera, M.J. Colea, B.N. Nelsona, D.E. Williamsona, A.S. Wareb, D. Albanb, R. Sánchezc, G.Y. Fud, D.A. Monticellod, W.H. Minere and P.M. Valanjue
Show affiliationsPhysics issues are discussed for compact stellarator configurations which achieve good confinement by the fact that the magnetic field modulus |B| in magnetic co-ordinates is dominated by poloidally symmetric components. Two distinct configuration types are considered: (1) those which achieve their drift optimization and rotational transform at low β and low bootstrap current by appropriate plasma shaping; and (2) those which have a greater reliance on plasma β and bootstrap currents for supplying the transform and obtaining quasi-poloidal symmetry. Stability analysis of the latter group of devices against ballooning, kink and vertical displacement modes has indicated that stable β values on the order of 15% are possible. The first class of devices is being considered for a low β near term experiment that could explore some of the confinement features of the high β configurations.
52.55.Hc Stellarators, torsatrons, heliacs, bumpy tori, and other toroidal confinement devices
Issue 6 (June 2001)
Received 7 October 2000, accepted for publication 2 February 2001
D.A. Spong et al 2001 Nucl. Fusion 41 711
Nick Evanson 2004 Phys. Educ. 39 407
Olaf Dreyer et al 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 787
-accompanied ternary fission of
A Sandulescu et al 1998 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 24 181
P O Hess et al 2000 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 26 957
A S Ware et al 1996 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 38 1343
S Misicu and N Cârjan 1998 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 24 1745
M J Hart and A G R Evans 1988 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 3 421
Deepa Kasinathan et al 2007 New J. Phys. 9 235
D A Shapiro 1987 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 20 1230