S Westwood et al 2009 Metrologia 46 08019 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/46/1A/08019
S Westwood1, R Josephs1, A Daireaux1, R Wielgosz1, S Davies2, M Kang3, H Ting3, R Phillip4, F Malz4, Y Shimizu5, E Frias6, M Pérez6, P Apps7, M Fernandes-Whaley7, B De Vos7, K Wiangnon8, N Ruangrittinon9, S Wood10, D Duewer11, M Schantz11, M Bedner11, D Hancock11 and J Esker12
Show affiliationsUnder the auspices of the Organic Analysis Working Group (OAWG) of the Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière (CCQM) a laboratory comparison, CCQM-P20.e, was coordinated by the Bureau International de Poids et Mesures (BIPM) in 2006/2007. Nine national measurement institutes, two expert laboratories and the BIPM participated in the comparison. Participants were required to assign the mass fraction of theophylline present as the main component in two separate study samples (CCQM-P20.e.1 and CCQM-P20.e.2).
CCQM-P20.e.1 consisted of a high-purity theophylline material obtained from a commercial supplier. CCQM-P20.e.2 consisted of theophylline to which known amounts of the related structure compounds theobromine and caffeine were added in a homogenous, gravimetrically controlled fashion. For the CCQM-P20.e.2 sample it was possible to estimate gravimetric reference values both for the main component and for the two spiked impurities.
In addition to assigning the mass fraction content of theophylline for both materials, participants were requested but not obliged to provide mass fraction estimates for the minor components they identified in each sample.
The results reported by the study participants for the mass fraction content of theophylline in both materials showed good levels of agreement both with each other and with the gravimetric reference value assigned to the CCQM-P20.e.2 material. There was also satisfactory agreement overall, albeit at higher levels of uncertainty, in the quantification data reported for the minor components present in both samples. In the few cases where a significant deviation was observed from the consensus values reported by the comparison participants or gravimetric reference values where these where available, they appeared to arise from the use of non-optimal chromatographic separation conditions.
The results demonstrate the feasibility for laboratories to assign mass fraction content with associated absolute expanded uncertainties in the range 0.05% to 0.5% for solid organic compounds of high purity (mass fraction of main component >995 mg/g) and in the range 0.1% to 1% for compounds of lower purity (mass fraction of main component >980 mg/g).
Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report.
The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM Working Group on Organic Analysis.
Issue 1A (Technical Supplement 2009)
S Westwood et al 2009 Metrologia 46 08019
A Picard et al 2008 Metrologia 45 149
Joële Viallon et al 2008 Metrologia 45 08009
C R Quétel et al 2007 Metrologia 44 08010
Joële Viallon et al 2006 Metrologia 43 08010
R Felder 2005 Metrologia 42 323
Adriaan M H van der Veen et al 2005 Metrologia 42 08004
T J Quinn 2003 Metrologia 40 103
C S J Wolff Briche 2003 Metrologia 40 08010
F Delahaye et al 2000 Metrologia 37 659