Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Final report of the bilateral comparison APMP.M.H-S2 of hardness measurement for Rockwell scales A and B between PTB and NIMT

Tassanai Sanponpute1, Apichaya Meesaplak1, Konrad Herrmann2 and Febo Menelao2

Show affiliations


SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON

The bilateral comparison APMP.M.H-S2 of hardness measurement for Rockwell scales A and B was arranged by the National Institute of Metrology of Thailand, NIMT, as the pilot laboratory, comparing with Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt of Germany, PTB. The objective of this comparison was to confirm the calibration and measurement capabilities of NIMT in hardness measurement. The period of measurement covered March to August 2009. There were two sets of artefacts: scale A artefact set and scale B artefact set. The scale A artefact set consisted of seven hardness blocks: 35 HRA, 40 HRA, 55 HRA, 60 HRA, 70 HRA, 80 HRA, 85 HRA. The artefact set for scale B consisted of nine hardness blocks: 25 HRB, 30 HRB, 40 HRB, 50 HRB, 60 HRB, 70 HRB, 80 HRB, 90 HRB, 100 HRB. Laboratories had to ensure that the primary Rockwell hardness machines passed the verification process according to ISO 6508-3. Then participants measured the hardness value by making ten indentations in a designated area of each artefact block. Hardness measurement results and uncertainty budget were then reported to the pilot laboratory and were used to compute the degrees of equivalence in terms of the Comparison Reference Value (CRV) and En ratio.

Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.

The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by APMP, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).


Dates

Issue 1A (Technical Supplement 2009)



  1. Final report of the bilateral comparison APMP.M.H-S2 of hardness measurement for Rockwell scales A and B between PTB and NIMT

    Tassanai Sanponpute et al 2009 Metrologia 46 07015

  2. Screening of the resistive-wall impedance by a cylindrical electron plasma

    A Al-Khateeb et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 083008

  3. Effects of mobility on ordering dynamics

    Andrea Baronchelli and Romualdo Pastor-Satorras J. Stat. Mech. (2009) L11001

  4. Updated bounds on milli-charged particles

    Sacha Davidson et al JHEP05(2000)003

  5. Observation prospects of leptonic and Dalitz decays of pseudoscalar quarkonia

    Yu Jia and Wen-Long Sang JHEP10(2009)090

  6. Experimental design and analysis for piezoelectric circular actuators in flow control applications

    Poorna Mane et al 2008 Smart Mater. Struct. 17 015013

  7. Issues in mathematical modeling of piezoelectric energy harvesters

    A Erturk and D J Inman 2008 Smart Mater. Struct. 17 065016

  8. Electron energy distribution functions and second kind collisions

    M Capitelli et al 2009 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 18 014014

  9. Continuous dynamic flow micropumps for microfluid manipulation

    Lingxin Chen et al 2008 J. Micromech. Microeng. 18 013001

  10. Sfermion masses in the supersymmetric economical 3-3-1 model

    P.V. Dong et al JHEP11(2007)073

View by subject




Export





Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.