Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Comparison of the Josephson voltage standards of the LNE and the BIPM (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K10.b)

S Solve1, R Chayramy1, S Djorjevic2 and O Séron2

Show affiliations


KEY COMPARISON

A comparison of the 10 V Josephson array voltage standard of the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was made with that of the Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d'Essais (LNE), France, in December 2007. The results are in very good agreement and the estimated combined relative standard uncertainty is 1.1 parts in 1011.

This comparison is the first to follow the new version of the technical protocols for BIPM.EM-K10a & b (Options A and B1), which were reviewed by the experts designated during the 23rd CCEM (2007) to be members of the CCEM Support Group for BIPM direct on-site Josephson comparisons. The difference with the previous version of the protocol is the insertion of the following rule: "When a significant improvement is obtained during the comparison both the initial and the final results are added to the KCDB with a note, but only the final result appears on the graph of results."

This article describes the technical details of the experiments which were carried out to achieve the final result of the comparison.

1 Option A is the scheme where the BIPM measures the JVS of the participant with its measurement setup. Option B is the other way around.

Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.

The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).


Dates

Issue 1A ( 1 January 2009)



  1. Comparison of the Josephson voltage standards of the LNE and the BIPM (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K10.b)

    S Solve et al 2009 Metrologia 46 01002

  2. On the q-quantum gravity loop algebra

    Seth Major 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 065003

  3. Basic logic and quantum entanglement

    P A Zizzi 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 67 012045

  4. Rapid fabrication of nanoneedle arrays by ion sputtering

    Yi-Zhong Huang et al 2008 Nanotechnology 19 015303

  5. General axisymmetric solutions and self-tuning in 6D chiral gauged supergravity

    Clifford P. Burgess et al JHEP11(2004)069

  6. Infrared structure of e+e → 3 jets at NNLO

    Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder et al JHEP11(2007)058

  7. Weak distinction and the optimal definition of causal continuity

    E Minguzzi 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 075015

  8. Physical unitarity for massive non-abelian gauge theories in the Landau gauge: Stückelberg & Higgs

    Ruggero Ferrari and Andrea Quadri JHEP11(2004)019

  9. Probing proton spin structure via heavy flavor production in PHENIX

    Xiaorong Wang (for PHENIX Collaboration) 2008 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35 044069

  10. Fluctuation theorems for stochastic dynamics

    R J Harris and G M Schütz J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P07020

View by subject




Export





Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.