Judah Levine 2008 Metrologia 45 S23 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/45/6/S04
Judah Levine
Show affiliationsI will describe the backup time scale system that I have constructed at the site of the NIST radio stations near Fort Collins, Colorado, and I will compare its performance with the primary ensemble in Boulder. The Fort Collins system is designed to be a backup for the Boulder system and is intended to support all of the NIST time services should the primary scale become unavailable for any reason. The backup time has a number of unique problems and requirements, and I will discuss the design considerations that I used to address these issues. The backup scale tracks UTC(NIST) in frequency with an uncertainty (measured by the Allan deviation of the difference) of about 1 × 10−14 by use of administrative steering that is applied not more often than once per week. The corresponding time deviation is less than 1 ns for all averaging times less than 1 week, and the peak time difference between UTC(NIST) and its backup realization is less than ±25 ns and is generally much better than this value. This is much better than would be needed for supporting the radio stations, the digital time services (ACTS, a time service that provides time in a digital format using dial-up telephone lines, and the Internet services) and the Frequency Measurement Service. Its frequency stability and time accuracy would not be adequate for the most demanding users of the Global Time Service and for international time and frequency coordination. The primary limitations to the performance of the backup time scale are caused by environmental perturbations, especially temperature and supply voltage, and the existing hardware could probably support all of the NIST services if the environment were improved.
Issue 6 (December 2008)
Received 25 June 2008
Published 5 December 2008
Judah Levine 2008 Metrologia 45 S23
I V Mikityuk 2003 Russ. Math. Surv. 58 185
Kiwoon Choi et al JHEP11(2004)076
D Wirosoetisno and J Vanneste 2005 Nonlinearity 18 2657
Alex Bayliss et al 2004 Phys. Educ. 39 137
R Metzler et al 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 317
Paul V Halstead and Gareth T James 1984 Phys. Educ. 19 275
Y S Myung 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 1279
U A Mueller and H D Doebner 1993 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 26 719
Adam W Majewski 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 123