B D Hall 2008 Metrologia 45 L5 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/45/2/N01
B D Hall
Show affiliationsThis communication demonstrates the need for independent validation when an uncertainty calculation procedure is applied to a particular type of measurement problem. A simple measurement scenario is used to highlight differences in the performance of two general methods of uncertainty calculation, one from the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) and one from Supplement 1 to the 'Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement'—Propagation of Distributions using a Monte Carlo method. The performance of these methods is investigated in terms of the long-run success rate when applied to many simulated measurements in the scenario. An individual application of the method is deemed successful if an uncertainty interval containing the measurand is obtained. The alternative approach to validation taken in the Supplement, that an uncertainty interval calculated by a Monte Carlo method can be used to validate the GUM method, is not consistent with the results of this study.
Issue 2 (April 2008)
Received 31 October 2007
Published 11 March 2008
B D Hall 2008 Metrologia 45 L5
F Angulo-Brown et al 1994 Eur. J. Phys. 15 38
Divakar Viswanath 2003 Nonlinearity 16 1035
Sheldon Goldstein et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 1567
Robert Fairbrother et al 2006 Phys. Educ. 41 130
Murtuza Lokhandwalla et al 2001 Phys. Med. Biol. 46 1245
C Cohen-Tannoudji and S Reynaud 1977 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 10 345
Cinthia Piamonteze et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012015
Christoph Mayer and Thomas Mohaupt 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 379
Zhao Jian et al 2003 Chinese Phys. Lett. 20 377