C Rauta et al 2008 Metrologia 45 03001 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/45/1A/03001
C Rauta1, E Renaot2, M H Valin2, M Elgourdou2, F Adunka3, A van der Linden4, A Steiner5, J Bartu6, M Smid7, M Sindelar7, E Tegeler8, Ute Noatsch8, J-U Holtoug9, V Chimenti10, M Anagnostou11, T Weckstrøm12, G Sutton13, R Rusby13, F Pavese14, P P M Steur14, P Marcarino14, M J de Groot15, E Filipe16, I Lobo16, J Ivarsson17, S Duris18, J Bojkovski19, Miha Hiti19, S Ugur20, A K Dogan20 and E Grudniewicz21
Show affiliationsComparisons of indium freezing point cells have been carried out by the EUROMET TC-THERM group as Projects Nos 391 and 712. The main objective was to establish the agreement between the realizations of the indium freezing point within different participating laboratories, to identify and eliminate possible discrepancies. The equipment has been made available by BNM–INM. Justervesenet coordinated project no 391, while project 712 was coordinated by BNM–INM. This paper is the final report of the results obtained, including the uncertainties in the comparisons and the degrees of equivalence between the laboratories.
Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.
The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by EUROMET, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).
Issue 1A ( 1 January 2008)
C Rauta et al 2008 Metrologia 45 03001
Vijay Balasubramanian et al JHEP03(2005)007
Stefan Legel et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 045016
J E Hirsch 2009 Phys. Scr. 80 035702
Paolo Creminelli et al JHEP09(2008)036
K Ni et al 2006 JINST 1 P09004
R Goebel et al 2008 Metrologia 45 01004
Yiping Wang et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 465701
Leigh Johnson et al 2008 Metrologia 45 01003
Aseem Paranjape and T P Singh JCAP03(2008)023