François O Bochud et al 2007 Metrologia 44 S95 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/44/4/S13
François O Bochud, Claude J Bailat and Jean-Pascal Laedermann
Show affiliationsThe most intuitive way of defining a probability is perhaps through the frequency at which it appears when a large number of trials are realized in identical conditions. The probability derived from the obtained histogram characterizes the so-called frequentist or conventional statistical approach. In this sense, probability is defined as a physical property of the observed system. By contrast, in Bayesian statistics, a probability is not a physical property or a directly observable quantity, but a degree of belief or an element of inference. The goal of this paper is to show how Bayesian statistics can be used in radionuclide metrology and what its advantages and disadvantages are compared with conventional statistics. This is performed through the example of an yttrium-90 source typically encountered in environmental surveillance measurement. Because of the very low activity of this kind of source and the small half-life of the radionuclide, this measurement takes several days, during which the source decays significantly. Several methods are proposed to compute simultaneously the number of unstable nuclei at a given reference time, the decay constant and the background. Asymptotically, all approaches give the same result. However, Bayesian statistics produces coherent estimates and confidence intervals in a much smaller number of measurements. Apart from the conceptual understanding of statistics, the main difficulty that could deter radionuclide metrologists from using Bayesian statistics is the complexity of the computation.
06.20.Dk Measurement and error theory
29.25.Rm Sources of radioactive nuclei
06.30.-k Measurements common to several branches of physics and astronomy
Accelerators, beams and electromagnetism
Issue 4 (August 2007)
Received 7 March 2007
Published 2 August 2007
François O Bochud et al 2007 Metrologia 44 S95
Z Chen et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 1393
M Krüger et al 2003 New J. Phys. 5 138
Bhuvnesh Jain 2007 New J. Phys. 9
A L Kholmetskii 2006 Eur. J. Phys. 27 825
Shin'ichi Nojiri and Sergei D Odintsov 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 66 012005
Y Tsuji et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 191 012010
M Hilts et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 1727
Giovanni Arcioni et al JHEP07(2001)035
Matthew R Orton et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 2393