Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

International Comparison CCQM-K41: Hydrogen sulfide in nitrogen

Franklin R Guenther1, Walter R Miller1, David L Duewer1, Gwi Suk Heo2, Yong-Doo Kim2, Adriaan M H van der Veen3, Leonid Konopelko4, Yury Kustikov4, Nina Shor4, Chris Brookes5, Martin Milton5, Florbela Dias6 and Han Qiao7

Show affiliations


KEY COMPARISON

This key comparison was intended to compare the capabilities for the preparation and value assignment of gas standards for hydrogen sulfide in nitrogen, maintained at the participating national metrology institutes. The range of the nominal amount-of-substance fractions of the comparison standard is 10 µmol/mol, which is close to regulatory levels in most countries.

The measurements in this key comparison took place in 2005. There were 7 participants. The KCRV was calculated from the participants' data, and thus represents a consensus value. This was necessary due to the fact that the cylinders could not be prepared gravimetrically as hydrogen sulfide may be absorbed onto the walls of the cylinder, and has been shown to be unstable in cylinders at the comparison concentration. Thus the gas mixtures were procured from a vendor as a homogeneous lot of 12 cylinders, analyzed by the coordinating laboratory for 6 months to determine stability, and then those determined to be stable were shipped to the participants for analysis. After analysis, the cylinders were returned to the coordinating laboratory for reanalysis. Through this protocol the coordinating laboratory could track stability. In parallel, the coordinating laboratory also analyzed a stable reference, a hydrogen sulfide gas mixture that had been shown to be stable over many years. Using the lot stability data, the participant's analytical results, and the coordinating laboratories' analysis of the stable reference, a consensus value could be calculated which represents the concentration of the stable reference.

The key comparison demonstrated that the results of the laboratories agreed within 0.5% relative to the consensus value. A subset of 6 participants' results agreed with the consensus value to better than 0.25%.

Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.

The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).


Dates

Issue 1A ( 1 January 2007)



  1. International Comparison CCQM-K41: Hydrogen sulfide in nitrogen

    Franklin R Guenther et al 2007 Metrologia 44 08004

  2. Tachyon condensation in open-closed p-adic string theory

    Nicolas Moeller and Martin Schnabl JHEP01(2004)011

  3. Hubble Space Telescope Spectroscopic Observations of the Narrow-Line Region in Nearby Low-Luminosity Active Galactic Nuclei

    Jonelle L. Walsh et al. 2008 The Astronomical Journal 136 1677

  4. LISA and LISA PathFinder, the endeavour to detect low frequency GWs

    H Araújo et al 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 66 012003

  5. Author index with titles

    2009 Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 17 089901

  6. BIPM comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Cr-51 of the activity measurements of the radionuclide 51Cr

    G Ratel and C Michotte 2003 Metrologia 40 06008

  7. Comparison of helium two-step plasma emission with that predicted from measured cross sections

    C A DeJoseph Jr et al 2008 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 085701

  8. Eddy current damper feasibility in automobile suspension: modeling, simulation and testing

    Babak Ebrahimi et al 2009 Smart Mater. Struct. 18 015017

  9. Final report: SIM regional comparison of ac–dc voltage transfer difference (SIM.EM.K6a, SIM.EM-K9 and SIM.EM-K11)

    Sara Campos et al 2009 Metrologia 46 01004

  10. Achieving non-contracted and non-filamentary rare-gas tubular discharges at atmospheric pressure

    E Castaños-Martínez et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 012003

View by subject




Export







Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.