J Chen et al 2007 Metrologia 44 06005 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/44/1A/06005
J Chen1, Z Wang1, C Rong1, G Lövestam2, A Plompen2, N Puglisi2, D M Gilliam3, C M Eisenhauer3, J S Nico3, M S Dewey3, K Kudo4, A Uritani4, H Harano4, N Takeda4, D J Thomas5, N J Roberts5, A Bennett5, P Kolkowski5, N N Moisseev6, I A Kharitonov6, S Guldbakke7, H Klein7, R Nolte7 and D Schlegel7
Show affiliationsCCRI Section III (neutron measurements) conducted a unique key comparison of neutron fluence measurements in mono-energetic neutron fields. In contrast to former comparisons, here the fluence measurements were performed with the participants' instruments in the same neutron fields at the PTB accelerator facility. Seven laboratories—the CIAE (China), IRMM (EC), NMIJ (Japan), NIST (USA), NPL (UK), PTB (Germany) and the VNIIM (Russia)—employed their primary standard reference methods or transfer instruments carefully calibrated against their primary standards, to determine the fluence of 0.144 MeV, 1.2 MeV, 5.0 MeV and 14.8 MeV neutrons and reported calibration coefficients for a selected neutron monitor and each neutron energy with a detailed uncertainty budget for the measurements.
The key comparison reference values (KCRV) were finally evaluated as the weighted mean values of the neutron fluence at 1 m distance from the target in vacuum per neutron monitor count. The uncertainties of each KCRV amounted to about 1%. The degree of equivalence (DoE), defined as the deviation of the result reported by the laboratories for each energy from the corresponding KCRV, and the associated expanded uncertainty are also reported. The deviations between the results of two laboratories each with the corresponding expanded uncertainties complete the documentation of the degrees of equivalence.
Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.
The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI Section III, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).
Issue 1A ( 1 January 2007)
J Chen et al 2007 Metrologia 44 06005
N Kumari et al 2008 J. Micromech. Microeng. 18 085018
Jin Seog Kim et al 2003 Metrologia 40 08009
Norbert Nemec et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 065014
Maria Nordström et al 2008 J. Micromech. Microeng. 18 015017
T Paterek et al 2010 New J. Phys. 12 013019
P O Hetland et al 2005 Metrologia 42 01009
T Ikehara and T Tsuchiya 2008 J. Micromech. Microeng. 18 075004
Zhi-hao Yuan et al 2008 Nanotechnology 19 075608
Marc Mars 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 66 012004