Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Recent recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Length (CCL) regarding strategies for evaluating key comparison data

FREE ARTICLE

Jennifer E Decker1,4, N Brown2, Maurice G Cox3, A G Steele1 and R J Douglas2

Show affiliations


[1]
Cox M G 2002 The evaluation of key comparison data Metrologia 39 589-95
IOPscience 
[2]
Beissner K 2002 On a measure of consistency in comparison measurements Metrologia 39 59-63
IOPscience 
[3]
Beissner K 2003 On a measure of consistency in comparison measurements: II. Using effective degrees of freedom Metrologia 40 31-5
IOPscience 
[4]
Kacker R, Datla R and Parr A 2002 Combined result and associated uncertainty from interlaboratory evaluations based on the ISO Guide Metrologia 39 279-93
IOPscience 
[5]
Steele A G and Douglas R J 2005 Chi-squared statistics for KCRV candidates Metrologia 42 253-61
IOPscience 
[6]
http://www.bipm.org/en/cipm-mra/

[7]
http://www.bipm.org/utils/en/pdf/guidelines.pdf

[8]
Steele A G and Douglas R J 2006 Extending chi-squared statistics for key comparisons in metrology J. Comput. Appl. Math. 192 51-8
CrossRef 
[9]
Thalmann R 2002 CCL key comparison: calibration of gauge blocks by interferometry Metrologia 39 165-77
IOPscience 
[10]
Stone J A 2005 Methods for evaluating the reference value in laboratory intercomparisons of dimensional measurements Recent Developments in Traceable Dimensional Measurements III Proc. SPIE 5879 58790V-1-8 ed J E Decker and G S Peng
CrossRef 
[11]
Brown N 2005 A new approach to determining the key comparison reference value Recent Developments in Traceable Dimensional Measurements III Proc. SPIE 5879 58790W-1-7 J E Decker and G S Peng ed
CrossRef 
[12]
BIPM IEC IFCC ISO IUPAC IUPAP OIML 1995 Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (Geneva: International Organization for Standardization) corrected and reprinted

[13]
Lewis A 2003 CCL-K2: Long gauge block measurement by interferometry: final report Metrologia 40 (Tech. Suppl.) 04004
IOPscience 
[14]
Bosse H, Häßler-Grohne W, Flügge J and Köning R 2003 Final report on CCL-S3 supplementary line scale comparison Nano3 Metrologia 40 (Tech. Suppl.) 04002
IOPscience 
[15]
Cox M G, Harris P M and Woolliams E R 2005 Data evaluation of key comparisons involving linked bilateral measurements and multiple artefacts NCSL Int. Workshop Symp. (Washington, USA)

[16]
Cox M G, Harris P M and Woolliams E R 2006 Data evaluation of key comparisons involving several artefacts Advanced Mathematical Tools in Metrology VII ed P Ciarlini et al (Singapore: World Scientific) pp 23-34
CrossRef 
[17]
Woolliams E R, Fox N P, Cox M G, Harris P M and Harrison N J 2006 The CCPR K1-a key comparison of spectral irradiance from 250 nm to 2500 nm: measurements, analysis and results Metrologia 43 S98-104
IOPscience 
[18]
BIPM IEC IFCC ILAC ISO IUPAC IUPAP OIML 2006 Evaluation of measurement data-Supplement 1 to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement- Propagation of Distributions Using a Monte Carlo Method (Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology) Draft

[19]
Steele A G and Douglas R J 2006 Simplifications from simulations NCSLI Meas. 1 57-68

[20]
Steele A G and Douglas R J 2005 http://inms-ienm.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/qde/montecarlo/

[21]
Douglas R J and Steele A G 2006 Pair-difference chi-squared statistics for key comparisons Metrologia 43 89-97
IOPscience 
[22]
Steele A G and Douglas R J 2006 Simplicity with advanced mathematical tools for measurement and testing Measurement 39 795-807
CrossRef 
[23]
Steele A G and Douglas R J 2006 Extending En for measurement science Metrologia 43 S235-43
IOPscience 
[24]
Steele A G and Douglas R J http://inms-ienm.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/qde/montecarlo/EnToolkit.html

[25]
Decker J E, Alschuler J, Candanedo C J, De la Cruz E, Esteban E P, Morales R, de Oliveira J C V, Stone J, Stoup J and Pekelsky J R SIM.4.2 Regional Comparison Stage One: Calibration of gauge blocks by optical interferometry Metrologia submitted

[26]
Steele A G, Wood B M and Douglas R J 2005 Outlier rejection for the weighted-mean KCRV Metrologia 42 32-8
IOPscience 
[27]
Cox M G The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset. In preparation

[28]
Steele A G, Wood B M and Douglas R J 2001 Exclusive statistics: simple treatment of the unavoidable correlations from key comparison reference values Metrologia 38 483-8
IOPscience 
[29]
Wood B M, Steele A G and Douglas R J 2000-2003 http://inms-ienm.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/qde

crossref member

Users also read

What's this?
This innovative new feature generates a list of articles 'also read' by other users based on them reading the original article. Article abstracts citations and references are all considered and weighted accordingly. We hope that this will help you find relevant papers for your research.

  1. Measurement uncertainty and traceability
  2. The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset

Related review articles

What's this?
View review articles related to this research to gain an insight into the key trends in this subject area. Related review articles are selected based on PACS/MSC codes, and are no more than three years old.

  1. Gravimetric methods for the preparation of standard gas mixtures
  2. Laser frequency standards at the P N Lebedev Physical Institute
  3. Bandwidth characteristics and comparisons of surface texture measuring instruments
More

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.