Rüdiger Kessel et al 2006 Metrologia 43 S189 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/43/4/S04
Rüdiger Kessel1, Raghu Kacker2,4 and Michael Berglund3
Show affiliationsThe International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) describes a generic procedure for determining an estimate for the value of the measurand and its associated combined standard uncertainty from the estimates and their associated standard uncertainties for various input quantities. A user of the ISO-GUM who is interested in understanding, managing or improving the measurement procedure needs the details, usually expressed as an uncertainty budget, on how the estimate for the value of the measurand and its associated combined standard uncertainty were calculated. In particular, a user may be interested in quantifying the degrees of contribution to the combined standard uncertainty from its components. When the measurement equation is a linear function of uncorrelated input variables, the contribution from a component is usually quantified by the product of the component of uncertainty and its sensitivity coefficient. This paper introduces a coefficient of contribution that is suitable for both uncorrelated and correlated input variables. The proposed coefficient of contribution is useful for a variety of measurement equations. Correlations between input variables can significantly alter the relative importance of the contributions to the combined standard uncertainty from its components.
Issue 4 (August 2006)
Received 3 November 2005
Published 4 August 2006
Rüdiger Kessel et al 2006 Metrologia 43 S189
E C Zeeman 2002 Nonlinearity 15 1993
R J Petti 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 737
Sergey Yu Krylov and Joost W M Frenken 2007 New J. Phys. 9 398
Zafar Ahmed 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 472005
L H Liang et al 2003 Nanotechnology 14 438
Adriaan M H van der Veen and Maurice G Cox 2003 Metrologia 40 18
I Marshall et al 1991 Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 12 131
V D Frolov et al 1999 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 32 815
M Bandyopadhyay and J Chattopadhyay 2005 Nonlinearity 18 913