Ian M Mills et al 2005 Metrologia 42 71 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/42/2/001
Ian M Mills1, Peter J Mohr2, Terry J Quinn3, Barry N Taylor2 and Edwin R Williams2
Show affiliationsThe kilogram, the base unit of mass in the International System of Units (SI), is defined as the mass
of the international prototype of the kilogram. Clearly, this definition has the effect of fixing the value of
to be one kilogram exactly. In this paper, we review the benefits that would accrue if the kilogram were redefined so as to fix the value of either the Planck constant h or the Avogadro constant NA instead of
, without waiting for the experiments to determine h or NA currently underway to reach their desired relative standard uncertainty of about 10−8. A significant reduction in the uncertainties of the SI values of many other fundamental constants would result from either of these new definitions, at the expense of making the mass
of the international prototype a quantity whose value would have to be determined by experiment. However, by assigning a conventional value to
, the present highly precise worldwide uniformity of mass standards could still be retained. The advantages of redefining the kilogram immediately outweigh any apparent disadvantages, and we review the alternative forms that a new definition might take.
Issue 2 (April 2005)
Received 23 December 2004
Published 28 February 2005
Ian M Mills et al 2005 Metrologia 42 71
Lennart Robertsson 2005 Metrologia 42 458
Guy Ratel 2005 Metrologia 42 140
A Gosset and T Madec 2005 Metrologia 42 07003
D Burns 2004 Metrologia 41 L3
A Picard et al 2004 Metrologia 41 396
H-J von Martens et al 2004 Metrologia 41 09002
P W Martin 2003 Metrologia 40
Gérard Petit 2003 Metrologia 40 S252
S N Lea et al 2003 Metrologia 40 84