Ian M Mills et al 2005 Metrologia 42 71 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/42/2/001
Ian M Mills1, Peter J Mohr2, Terry J Quinn3, Barry N Taylor2 and Edwin R Williams2
Show affiliationsThe kilogram, the base unit of mass in the International System of Units (SI), is defined as the mass
of the international prototype of the kilogram. Clearly, this definition has the effect of fixing the value of
to be one kilogram exactly. In this paper, we review the benefits that would accrue if the kilogram were redefined so as to fix the value of either the Planck constant h or the Avogadro constant NA instead of
, without waiting for the experiments to determine h or NA currently underway to reach their desired relative standard uncertainty of about 10−8. A significant reduction in the uncertainties of the SI values of many other fundamental constants would result from either of these new definitions, at the expense of making the mass
of the international prototype a quantity whose value would have to be determined by experiment. However, by assigning a conventional value to
, the present highly precise worldwide uniformity of mass standards could still be retained. The advantages of redefining the kilogram immediately outweigh any apparent disadvantages, and we review the alternative forms that a new definition might take.
Issue 2 (April 2005)
Received 23 December 2004
Published 28 February 2005
Ian M Mills et al 2005 Metrologia 42 71
Luis Colina et al. 2004 ApJ 602 181
C Rebecca Simpson et al 1998 Phys. Med. Biol. 43 2465
S R Valluri et al 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 1327
Barry N Taylor 2009 Metrologia 46 L16
L. Ofman et al. 1999 ApJ 514 441
Yuri I. Izotov and Trinh X. Thuan 2004 ApJ 602 200
W Hume-Rothery and G V Raynor 1941 J. Sci. Instrum. 18 74
2009 Phys. Educ. 44
C. A. Rodríguez-Rico et al. 2005 ApJ 633 198