Michele M Schantz et al 2005 Metrologia 42 08005 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/42/1A/08005
Michele M Schantz1, David L Duewer1, Reenie M Parris1, Willie E May1, Marcellé Archer2, Chris Mussell3, David Carter3, Leonid A Konopelko4, Yury A Kustikov4, Anatoli I Krylov4 and Olga V Fatina4
Show affiliationsEthanol is important both forensically ('drunk driving' or driving while under the influence, 'DWI', regulations) and commercially (alcoholic beverages). Blood- and breath-alcohol testing can be imposed on individuals operating private vehicles such as cars, boats, or snowmobiles, or operators of commercial vehicles like trucks, planes, and ships. The various levels of blood alcohol that determine whether these operators are considered legally impaired vary depending on the circumstances and locality. Accurate calibration and validation of instrumentation is critical in areas of forensic testing where quantitative analysis directly affects the outcome of criminal prosecutions, as is the case with the determination of ethanol in blood and breath. Additionally, the accurate assessment of the alcoholic content of beverages is a commercially important commodity.
In 2002, the CCQM conducted a Key Comparison (CCQM-K27) for the determination of ethanol in aqueous matrix with nine participants. A report on this project has been approved by the CCQM and can be found at the BIPM website and in this Technical Supplement. CCQM-K27 comprised three samples, one at low mass fraction of ethanol in water (nominal concentration of 0.8 mg/g), one at high level (nominal concentration of 120 mg/g), and one wine matrix (nominal concentration of 81 mg/g). Overall agreement among eight participants using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID), titrimetry, isotope dilution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-IDMS), and gas chromatography–combustion–isotope ratio mass spectrometry (ID-GC-C-IRMS) was good. The ninth participant used a headspace GC-FID method that had not been validated in an earlier pilot study (CCQM-P35).
A follow-on Key Comparison, CCQM-K27-Subsequent, was initiated in 2003 to accommodate laboratories that had not been ready to benchmark their methods in the original CCQM-K27 study or that wished to benchmark a different method. Four levels of ethanol in water were used in the subsequent study (nominal concentrations of 0.2 mg/g, 1 mg/g, 3 mg/g, and 60 mg/g). The three participants in the CCQM-K27-Subsequent Key Comparison demonstrated their ability to measure ethanol in aqueous matrix in the concentration range of 0.2 mg/g to 60 mg/g.
Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report.
The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).
Issue 1A ( 1 January 2005)
Michele M Schantz et al 2005 Metrologia 42 08005
Kentaro Somiya et al 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 66 012053
J P Sullivan et al 2008 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 081001
C Saiyasombat et al 2008 Nanotechnology 19 085705
Qiyuan Pan and Jiliang Jing 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 038002
M Perkin 2009 Metrologia 46 07010
Junwei Chung and Wensyang Hsu 2008 J. Micromech. Microeng. 18 035014
R Schmied et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 045017
P McNeely et al 2009 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 18 014011
G Ratel et al 2004 Metrologia 41 06010