Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Linking the results of Key Comparisons CCEM-K8 and EUROMET.EM-K8

G Marullo Reedtz and R Cerri

Show affiliations


LINKAGE REPORT

Key comparisons CCEM-K8 and EUROMET.EM-K8 on DC voltage ratio were carried out in parallel, both having the Istituto Elettrotecnico Nazionale G Ferraris (IEN) as the pilot laboratory. Two Datron 4902S voltage dividers were used as travelling standards, each divider being dedicated to one comparison. On these dividers the measurements of the ratios 1000 V/10 V and 100 V/10 V were mandatory and were used to evaluate the degrees of equivalence of the participants with respect to the reference value of their own comparison.

The reference value of a key comparison carried out by a Consultative Committee of the CIPM, like CCEM-K8, is called the Key Comparison Reference Value (KCRV), and the degrees of equivalence of a regional comparison, like EUROMET.EM-K8, must be translated in terms of the KCRV. The two comparisons under study concern the measurement of voltage ratios, hence no national standard is involved. Then any participant in both comparisons can be considered equally able, in principle, to perform an unbiased measurement of the travelling standard. Since the number of participants in each comparison is significant and different methods of measurement were used, it is unlikely that the corresponding comparison reference value is affected by systematic errors. The degrees of equivalence with respect to the KCRV of the participants in EUROMET.EM-K8 are then the same as those with respect to the reference value of EUROMET.EM-K8.

The extended linking document reports a verification of such an assumption, based on the results of the common laboratories of the two comparisons.

Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Linkage Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.

The linkage report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).


Dates

Issue 1A ( 1 January 2004)



  1. Linking the results of Key Comparisons CCEM-K8 and EUROMET.EM-K8

    G Marullo Reedtz and R Cerri 2004 Metrologia 41 01002

  2. BIPM comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.In-111 of activity measurements of the radionuclide 111In

    G Ratel and C Michotte 2003 Metrologia 40 06017

  3. Magnetic sensitivity enhanced novel fluorescent magnetic silica nanoparticles for biomedical applications

    Jaemoon Yang et al 2008 Nanotechnology 19 075610

  4. Uniform film of conjugated polymer for light-emitting device by electrophoretic deposition

    Kazuya Tada and Mitsuyoshi Onoda 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 032001

  5. Dislocation motions in C60 crystals by an indentation test

    N Aota et al 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 074002

  6. Parameter degeneracy in flavor-dependent reconstruction of supernova neutrino fluxes

    Hisakazu Minakata et al JCAP12(2008)006

  7. M5-brane solution in ABJM theory and three-algebra

    Seiji Terashima and Futoshi Yagi JHEP12(2009)059

  8. Final Report of the APMP Comparison of Luminous Responsivity APMP.PR-K3.b

    J L Gardner and E Atkinson 2004 Metrologia 41 02002

  9. Semifluxons in superconductivity and cold atomic gases

    R Walser et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 045020

  10. Study on magnetorheological shear thickening fluid

    Xianzhou Zhang et al 2008 Smart Mater. Struct. 17 015051

View by subject




Export





Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.