Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Uncertainty calculation for the ratio of dependent measurements

Jan Hannig1, C M Wang2 and Hari K Iyer1

Show affiliations


A measurand θ of interest is the ratio of two other quantities, μp and μq. A measurement experiment is conducted and results P and Q are obtained as estimates of μp and μq. The ratio Y = P/Q is generally reported as the result for the measurand θ. In this paper we consider the problem of computing an uncertainty interval for θ having a prescribed confidence level of 1−α. Although an exact procedure, based on an approach due to Fieller, is available for this problem, it is well known that this procedure can lead to unbounded confidence regions in certain situations. As a result, practitioners often use various non-exact methods. One such non-exact method is based on the propagation-of-errors approach described in the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement to calculate a standard uncertainty uy for Y. A confidence interval for θ with a presumed confidence level of 95% is obtained as [Y−2uy, Y+2uy]. In this paper we develop a highly accurate approximation for the coverage probability associated with the interval [Ykuy, Y+kuy]. In particular, we demonstrate that, using n−1 degrees of freedom for uy, and the corresponding Student's t coverage factor k = t1−α/2 : n−1 rather than k = 2, leads to uncertainty intervals [Yt1−α/2 : n−1uy, Y+t1−α/2 : n−1uy], that are nearly identical to Fieller's exact intervals whenever the measurement relative uncertainties are small, as is the case in most metrological applications. In addition, they are easy to compute and may be recommended for routine use in metrological applications. Improved coverage factors k can be derived based on the results of this paper for those exceptional situations where the t-interval may not have coverage probability sufficiently close to the desired value.


PACS

06.20.Dk Measurement and error theory

Subjects

Instrumentation and measurement

Dates

Issue 4 (August 2003)

Received 2 April 2003

Published 13 June 2003



  1. Uncertainty calculation for the ratio of dependent measurements

    Jan Hannig et al 2003 Metrologia 40 177

  2. A docking analysis of the statistical physics of protein–protein recognition

    Julie Bernauer et al 2005 Phys. Biol. 2 S17

  3. One compact analytic expression of the diatomic centrifugal distortion constants to any order

    H Kobeissi and M Korek 1993 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 26 L35

  4. Annealed Treatment Effect in Poly(3-hexylthiophene):Methanofullerene Solar Cells

    Yu Huang-Zhong and Peng Jun-Biao 2008 Chinese Phys. Lett. 25 1411

  5. Beam dynamics of muon acceleration for neutrino factory

    S A Bogacz 2003 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 29 1723

  6. Spacetime foam at a TeV

    Luis A Anchordoqui 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 60 191

  7. The size dependence of the Einstein temperature of the tellurium nanoparticles

    H Ikemoto et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012126

  8. Progress in the generation of the UTC(CNM) in terms of a virtual clock

    J M López-Romero and N Díaz-Muñoz 2008 Metrologia 45 S59

  9. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization with gEUD-guided dose–volume objectives

    Qiuwen Wu et al 2003 Phys. Med. Biol. 48 279

  10. Impact of hierarchical modular structure on ranking of individual nodes in directed networks

    Naoki Masuda et al 2009 New J. Phys. 11 113002

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.