Time-scale formation, along with atomic time/frequency standards
and time comparison techniques, is one of the three basic ingredients of
Time Metrology.
Before summarizing this Symposium and the relevant outcomes, let
me make a couple of very general remarks.
Clocks and comparison methods have today reached a very high level of
accuracy: the nanosecond level. Some applications in the real word are
now challenging the capacity of the National Metrological Laboratories. It
is therefore essential that the algorithms dealing with clocks and
comparison techniques should be such as to make the most of
existing technologies. The comfortable margin of accuracy we were
used to, between Laboratories and the Field, is gone forever.
While clock makers and time-comparison experts meet regularly
(FCS, PTTI, EFTF, CPEM, URSI, UIT, etc), the somewhat
secluded community of experts in time-scale formation lacks a similar
point of contact, with the exception of the CCTF meeting. This venue
must consequently be welcomed.
Let me recall some highlights from this Symposium: there were
about 60 attendees from 15 nations, plus international institutions,
such as the host BIPM, and a supranational one, ESA.
About 30 papers, prepared in some 20 laboratories, were received:
among these papers, four tutorials were offered; descriptions of local time
scales including the local algorithms were presented; four papers
considered the algorithms applied to the results of time-comparison
methods; and six papers covered the special requirements of some
specialized time-scale 'users'.
The four basic ingredients of time-scale formation: models,
noise, filtering and steering, received attention and were also
discussed, not just during the sessions.
The most demanding applications for time scales now come
from Global Navigation Satellite systems; in six papers the progress of
some programmes was described and the present and future needs were
presented and documented.
The lively discussion on future navigation systems led to the
following four points:
an overall accuracy in timing of one nanosecond is a must;
the combined 'clock and orbit' effects on the knowledge of
satellite position should be less than one metre;
a combined solution for positioning and timing should be pursued;
a 'new' time window (2 h to 4 h) emerged, in which the accuracy
and stability parameters of the clocks forming a time scale for
space application are to be optimized. That interval is linked to
some criteria and methods for on-board clock corrections.
A revival of interest in the time-proven Kalman filter was noted; in
the course of a tutorial on past experience, a number of new approaches
were discussed. Some further research is in order, but one
should heed the comment:
'do not ask too much of a filter'. The Kalman approach is indeed powerful
in combining sets of different data, provided that the possible problems of
convergence are suitably addressed.
Attention was also focused on the possibility of becoming victims of
ever-present 'hidden' correlations.
The TAI algorithm, ALGOS, is about 30 years old and the
fundamental approach remains unchanged and unchallenged. A number of
small refinements, all justified, were introduced in the
'constants' and parameters, but the general philosophy holds.
In so far as the BIPM Time Section and the CCTF Working Group
on Algorithms are concerned, on the basis of the outcome of this
Symposium it is clear that they should follow the evolution of TAI and
suggest any appropriate action to the CCTF.
This Symposium, which gathered the world experts on T/F
algorithms in Paris for two days, offered a wonderful
opportunity for cross-fertilization between researchers
operating in different and interdependent communities that are
loosely connected.
Thanks are due to Felicitas Arias, Demetrios Matsakis and Patrizia
Tavella and their host organizations for having provided the community
with this learning experience.
One last comment: please do not wait another 14 years for the
next Time Scale Algorithm Symposium.