A P Miiller et al 2002 Metrologia 39 07001 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/39/1A/17
A P Miiller1, M Bergoglio2, N Bignell3, K M K Fen3, S S Hong4, K Jousten5, P Mohan6, F J Redgrave7 and M Sardi2
Show affiliationsA key comparison of low absolute pressure standards, organized under the auspices of the Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities (CCM), was carried out at seven national metrology institutes (NMIs) between March 1998 and September 1999 in order to determine the degrees of equivalence of the standards at pressures in the range 1 Pa to 1000 Pa. The primary standards, which represent two principal measurement methods, included five liquid-column manometers and four static expansion systems. The transfer standard package consisted of four high-precision pressure transducers: two capacitance diaphragm gauges to provide high resolution at low pressures, and two resonant silicon gauges to provide the required calibration stability. Two nominally identical transfer packages were used to reduce the time required for the measurements, with Package A being circulated among laboratories in the European region (Istituto di Metrologia G. Colonnetti, Italy; National Physical Laboratory, UK; Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany) and Package B in the Asia-Pacific region (CSIRO-National Measurement Laboratory, Australia; Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science; National Physical Laboratory of India). The results obtained were normalized using data obtained from simultaneous calibrations of the two packages at the pilot laboratory (National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA). The degrees of equivalence of the measurement standards were determined in two ways: deviations from key comparison reference values and pairwise differences between these deviations. Apart from results from one NMI that were identified as outliers, the absolute-pressure standards of the participants were generally found to be equivalent and the results revealed no significant relative bias between the two principal methods tested.
Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database www.bipm.org/kcdb.
This Final Report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM according to the provisions of the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).
06.30.-k Measurements common to several branches of physics and astronomy
07.07.Hj Display and recording equipment, oscilloscopes, TV cameras, etc.
Issue 1A (Technical Supplement 2002)
A P Miiller et al 2002 Metrologia 39 07001
D Sherrington 1980 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13 637
Johan F Prins 2003 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 18 S125
C Wiesendanger 1996 Class. Quantum Grav. 13 681
Kazuya Koumoto et al 2001 Nanotechnology 12 25
F Calogero and J-P Françoise 1997 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 30 211
P LeMinh et al 2003 J. Micromech. Microeng. 13 425
Paul V Lambeck 2006 Meas. Sci. Technol. 17 R93
M H Miller et al 2006 J. Micromech. Microeng. 16 303
M Khorrami et al 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 345